From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Gary R Hook <ghook@amd.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Hook, Gary" <Gary.Hook@amd.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/mem_encrypt: Disable all instrumentation for SME early boot code
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 21:08:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190408190800.GL15689@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a14050e-2516-5c0f-195d-611c6959b94b@amd.com>
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 06:41:30PM +0000, Gary R Hook wrote:
> Again, not arguing. I completely understand. However, to be fair, this
> isn't about SME having trouble with those facilities, this is about
> using certain features (e.g. command line option processing) early in
> the boot. Any complex feature could have had that requirement, don't you
> think?
Sure, but then why do we need that patch at all then? Why do we need to
disable instrumentation for SME early code and not for other early code?
I mean, if you grep around the tree you can see a bunch of
KASAN_SANITIZE but in lib/ we only have
lib/Makefile:210:KASAN_SANITIZE_stackdepot.o := n
which is special. But the rest of the generic code in lib/ or
arch/x86/lib/ isn't.
Now, there's this:
arch/x86/boot/Makefile:12:KASAN_SANITIZE := n
arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile:20:KASAN_SANITIZE := n
which disables KASAN for all boot code.
And this is what you mean - all early boot code should not be sanitized.
Which also gives the right solution, IMO:
cmdline.o should not be sanitized only when used in the boot code. But
that is already the case.
So why do you need to disable KASAN for arch/x86/lib/cmdline.c?
Because for those two:
arch/x86/boot/cmdline.c
arch/x86/boot/compressed/cmdline.c
that should already be the case due to the Makefile defines above.
> Right. My goal was to get a conversation started, because folks are
> running into this problem when KASAN is enabled.
You say KASAN. Why is there KCOV_INSTRUMENT_cmdline.o too?
> N.B. Here's another facet of this problem: cmdline.c doesn't (today)
> contain anything that would trigger the stack protector. However, it's
> possible to enable the stack protector globally when building, right? In
> which case, a boot would fail, so we have the same issue: early boot
> code has special requirements / restrictions.
How so?
This .config boots here in a vm just fine.
$ grep STACKPROT .config
CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR=y
CONFIG_HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR=y
CONFIG_CC_HAS_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE=y
CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=y
CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG=y
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-08 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-04 20:26 Hook, Gary
2019-04-04 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-08 16:46 ` Gary R Hook
2019-04-08 16:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-08 18:41 ` Gary R Hook
2019-04-08 19:08 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-04-09 13:47 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-04-26 15:11 ` Gary R Hook
2019-04-26 16:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-29 20:16 ` Gary R Hook
2019-04-29 20:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-29 21:22 ` Gary R Hook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190408190800.GL15689@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=Gary.Hook@amd.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ghook@amd.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®