From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: Remove forced unbuffering for test running
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 15:37:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190520223749.13476-2-keescook@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190520223749.13476-1-keescook@chromium.org>
As it turns out, the "stdbuf" command will actually force all
subprocesses into unbuffered output, and some implementations of "echo"
turn into single-character writes, which utterly wrecks writes to /sys
and /proc files.
Instead, drop the "stdbuf" usage, and for any tests that want explicit
flushing between newlines, they'll have to add "fflush(stdout);" as
needed.
Reported-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Fixes: 5c069b6dedef ("selftests: Move test output to diagnostic lines")
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh | 12 +-----------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh
index eff3ee303d0d..00c9020bdda8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh
@@ -24,16 +24,6 @@ tap_prefix()
fi
}
-# If stdbuf is unavailable, we must fall back to line-at-a-time piping.
-tap_unbuffer()
-{
- if ! which stdbuf >/dev/null ; then
- "$@"
- else
- stdbuf -i0 -o0 -e0 "$@"
- fi
-}
-
run_one()
{
DIR="$1"
@@ -54,7 +44,7 @@ run_one()
echo "not ok $test_num $TEST_HDR_MSG"
else
cd `dirname $TEST` > /dev/null
- (((((tap_unbuffer ./$BASENAME_TEST 2>&1; echo $? >&3) |
+ (((((./$BASENAME_TEST 2>&1; echo $? >&3) |
tap_prefix >&4) 3>&1) |
(read xs; exit $xs)) 4>>"$logfile" &&
echo "ok $test_num $TEST_HDR_MSG") ||
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-20 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-20 22:37 [PATCH v5.2-rc2 0/2] " Kees Cook
2019-05-20 22:37 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2019-05-21 5:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Takashi Iwai
2019-05-21 14:12 ` shuah
2019-05-20 22:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/timers: Add missing fflush(stdout) calls Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190520223749.13476-2-keescook@chromium.org \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®