From: shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
shuah <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: Remove forced unbuffering for test running
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 08:12:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6a41345-7c98-751a-80bd-34d96e6de001@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hlfz0757d.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
On 5/20/19 11:21 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2019 00:37:48 +0200,
> Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> As it turns out, the "stdbuf" command will actually force all
>> subprocesses into unbuffered output, and some implementations of "echo"
>> turn into single-character writes, which utterly wrecks writes to /sys
>> and /proc files.
>>
>> Instead, drop the "stdbuf" usage, and for any tests that want explicit
>> flushing between newlines, they'll have to add "fflush(stdout);" as
>> needed.
>>
>> Reported-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
>> Fixes: 5c069b6dedef ("selftests: Move test output to diagnostic lines")
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>
> Tested-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
>
> BTW, this might be specific to shell invocation. As in the original
> discussion thread, it starts working when I replace "echo" with
> "/usr/bin/echo".
>
> Still it's not easy to control in a script itself, so dropping the
> unbuffered mode is certainly safer, yes.
>
> Thanks!
Thank you both.
I will get this in for next rc.
-- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-21 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-20 22:37 [PATCH v5.2-rc2 0/2] " Kees Cook
2019-05-20 22:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Kees Cook
2019-05-21 5:21 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-05-21 14:12 ` shuah [this message]
2019-05-20 22:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/timers: Add missing fflush(stdout) calls Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6a41345-7c98-751a-80bd-34d96e6de001@kernel.org \
--to=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome