mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: NMI hardlock stacktrace deadlock [was Re: Linux 5.2-rc5]
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:03:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190625030345.dwbydi2w67mpp4zq@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjoeZ9_aiu+642ur=iGhGjfBQhRPURxX9Py+-B6coctXw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:42:53PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 12:19 PM Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > Do you have the oops itself at all?
> >
> > An example at
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6310/fi-kbl-x1275/dmesg0.log
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6310/fi-kbl-x1275/boot0.log
> >
> > The bug causing the oops is clearly a driver problem. The rc5 fallout
> > just seems to be because of some shrinker changes affecting some object
> > reaping that were unfortunately still active. What perturbed the CI
> > team was the machine failed to panic & reboot.
> 
> Hmm. It's hard to guess at the cause of that. The oopses themselves
> don't look like they are happening in any particularly bad context, so
> all the normal reboot-on-oops etc stuff _should_ work.

Looking at the dmesg, panic_on_oops doesn't seem to be enabled: it went
through the rewind_stack_do_exit() path instead of the panic() path.  So
the system is apparently not configured to reboot on oops.

So I'd say the hang was presumably caused by a lock held by the oopsing
code.  So it looks normal to me, other than the original oops.

-- 
Josh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-25  3:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-16 19:06 Linux 5.2-rc5 Linus Torvalds
2019-06-19 12:39 ` NMI hardlock stacktrace deadlock [was Re: Linux 5.2-rc5] Chris Wilson
2019-06-19 18:49   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-19 19:19     ` Chris Wilson
2019-06-19 20:42       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-21 15:30         ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-21 18:37           ` Chris Wilson
2019-06-21 19:33             ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-21 19:56               ` Chris Wilson
2019-06-25  3:03         ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2019-06-26 12:26           ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190625030345.dwbydi2w67mpp4zq@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®