From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: NMI hardlock stacktrace deadlock [was Re: Linux 5.2-rc5]
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:26:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626082609.5c8489f0@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190625030345.dwbydi2w67mpp4zq@treble>
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:03:45 -0500
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> Looking at the dmesg, panic_on_oops doesn't seem to be enabled: it went
> through the rewind_stack_do_exit() path instead of the panic() path. So
> the system is apparently not configured to reboot on oops.
"Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/drm_intel root=/dev/sda1 rootwait fsck.repair=yes intel_iommu=igfx_off nmi_watchdog=panic,auto panic=5 softdog.soft_panic=5 drm.debug=0xe log_buf_len=1M 3 ro"
>
> So I'd say the hang was presumably caused by a lock held by the oopsing
> code. So it looks normal to me, other than the original oops.
>
Looks like its missing "oops=panic", as the documentation says:
oops=panic Always panic on oopses. Default is to just kill the
process, but there is a small probability of
deadlocking the machine.
This will also cause panics on machine check exceptions.
Useful together with panic=30 to trigger a reboot.
-- Steve
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-26 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-16 19:06 Linux 5.2-rc5 Linus Torvalds
2019-06-19 12:39 ` NMI hardlock stacktrace deadlock [was Re: Linux 5.2-rc5] Chris Wilson
2019-06-19 18:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-19 19:19 ` Chris Wilson
2019-06-19 20:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-21 15:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-21 18:37 ` Chris Wilson
2019-06-21 19:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-06-21 19:56 ` Chris Wilson
2019-06-25 3:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-06-26 12:26 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190626082609.5c8489f0@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®