From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/deadline: Cleanup on_dl_rq() handling
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:59:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190802145945.18702-4-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190802145945.18702-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Remove BUG_ON() in __enqueue_dl_entity() since there is already one in
enqueue_dl_entity().
Move the check that the dl_se is not on the dl_rq from
__dequeue_dl_entity() to dequeue_dl_entity() to align with the enqueue
side and use the on_dl_rq() helper function.
BUG_ON in dequeue_dl_entity() instead of silently return. Make this
possible by checking for !p->dl_throttled in dequeue_task_dl() before
calling __dequeue_task_dl(). update_curr_dl() will set
p->dl_throttled=1 in case it already calls __dequeue_task_dl().
The condition !p->dl_throttled && !on_dl_rq() is a BUG.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index c34e35e7ac23..2add54c8be8a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1407,8 +1407,6 @@ static void __enqueue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
struct sched_dl_entity *entry;
int leftmost = 1;
- BUG_ON(!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&dl_se->rb_node));
-
while (*link) {
parent = *link;
entry = rb_entry(parent, struct sched_dl_entity, rb_node);
@@ -1430,9 +1428,6 @@ static void __dequeue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
{
struct dl_rq *dl_rq = dl_rq_of_se(dl_se);
- if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&dl_se->rb_node))
- return;
-
rb_erase_cached(&dl_se->rb_node, &dl_rq->root);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&dl_se->rb_node);
@@ -1466,6 +1461,8 @@ enqueue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
static void dequeue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
{
+ BUG_ON(!on_dl_rq(dl_se));
+
__dequeue_dl_entity(dl_se);
}
@@ -1544,7 +1541,9 @@ static void __dequeue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
static void dequeue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
update_curr_dl(rq);
- __dequeue_task_dl(rq, p, flags);
+
+ if (!p->dl.dl_throttled)
+ __dequeue_task_dl(rq, p, flags);
if (p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING || flags & DEQUEUE_SAVE) {
sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
--
2.17.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-02 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-02 14:59 [PATCH v2 0/3] sched/deadline: Fix double accounting in push_dl_task() & some cleanups Dietmar Eggemann
2019-08-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/deadline: Fix double accounting of rq/running bw in push & pull Dietmar Eggemann
2019-08-06 11:19 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Dietmar Eggemann
2019-08-02 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sched/deadline: Use __sub_running_bw() throughout dl_change_utilization() Dietmar Eggemann
2019-08-02 14:59 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190802145945.18702-4-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®