mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] mm/oom_kill.c: fox oom_cpuset_eligible() comment
@ 2019-08-28  2:38 Yi Wang
  2019-08-28  7:10 ` Michal Hocko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yi Wang @ 2019-08-28  2:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm
  Cc: mhocko, penguin-kernel, guro, shakeelb, yuzhoujian, jglisse,
	ebiederm, hannes, linux-mm, linux-kernel, xue.zhihong, wang.yi59,
	up2wing, wang.liang82

Commit ac311a14c682 ("oom: decouple mems_allowed from oom_unkillable_task")
changed the function has_intersects_mems_allowed() to
oom_cpuset_eligible(), but didn't change the comment meanwhile.

Let's fix this.

Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
---
 mm/oom_kill.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index eda2e2a..65c092e 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static inline bool is_memcg_oom(struct oom_control *oc)
 /**
  * oom_cpuset_eligible() - check task eligiblity for kill
  * @start: task struct of which task to consider
- * @mask: nodemask passed to page allocator for mempolicy ooms
+ * @oc: pointer to struct oom_control
  *
  * Task eligibility is determined by whether or not a candidate task, @tsk,
  * shares the same mempolicy nodes as current if it is bound by such a policy
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill.c: fox oom_cpuset_eligible() comment
  2019-08-28  2:38 [PATCH] mm/oom_kill.c: fox oom_cpuset_eligible() comment Yi Wang
@ 2019-08-28  7:10 ` Michal Hocko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2019-08-28  7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yi Wang
  Cc: akpm, penguin-kernel, guro, shakeelb, yuzhoujian, jglisse,
	ebiederm, hannes, linux-mm, linux-kernel, xue.zhihong, up2wing,
	wang.liang82

s@fox@fix@

On Wed 28-08-19 10:38:49, Yi Wang wrote:
> Commit ac311a14c682 ("oom: decouple mems_allowed from oom_unkillable_task")
> changed the function has_intersects_mems_allowed() to
> oom_cpuset_eligible(), but didn't change the comment meanwhile.
> 
> Let's fix this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

Thanks!

> ---
>  mm/oom_kill.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index eda2e2a..65c092e 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static inline bool is_memcg_oom(struct oom_control *oc)
>  /**
>   * oom_cpuset_eligible() - check task eligiblity for kill
>   * @start: task struct of which task to consider
> - * @mask: nodemask passed to page allocator for mempolicy ooms
> + * @oc: pointer to struct oom_control
>   *
>   * Task eligibility is determined by whether or not a candidate task, @tsk,
>   * shares the same mempolicy nodes as current if it is bound by such a policy
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-28  7:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-28  2:38 [PATCH] mm/oom_kill.c: fox oom_cpuset_eligible() comment Yi Wang
2019-08-28  7:10 ` Michal Hocko

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®