[PATCH] perf tests: Fix a typo

[PATCH] perf tests: Fix a typo

[Leo Yan]

Correct typo in comment: s/suck/stuck.

Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
---
 tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
index 166f411568a5..415903b48578 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void)
 	 * breakpointed instruction.
 	 *
 	 * Since arm64 has the same issue with arm for the single-step
-	 * handling, this case also gets suck on the breakpointed
+	 * handling, this case also gets stuck on the breakpointed
 	 * instruction.
 	 *
 	 * Just disable the test for these architectures until these
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH] perf tests: Fix a typo

[Will Deacon]

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 04:33:24PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> Correct typo in comment: s/suck/stuck.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> index 166f411568a5..415903b48578 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void)
>  	 * breakpointed instruction.
>  	 *
>  	 * Since arm64 has the same issue with arm for the single-step
> -	 * handling, this case also gets suck on the breakpointed
> +	 * handling, this case also gets stuck on the breakpointed
>  	 * instruction.
>  	 *
>  	 * Just disable the test for these architectures until these

Thanks, and sorry for only spotting this after the offending patch was
merged.

Will

Re: [PATCH] perf tests: Fix a typo

[Leo Yan]

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:14:17AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 04:33:24PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > Correct typo in comment: s/suck/stuck.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> > index 166f411568a5..415903b48578 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void)
> >  	 * breakpointed instruction.
> >  	 *
> >  	 * Since arm64 has the same issue with arm for the single-step
> > -	 * handling, this case also gets suck on the breakpointed
> > +	 * handling, this case also gets stuck on the breakpointed
> >  	 * instruction.
> >  	 *
> >  	 * Just disable the test for these architectures until these
> 
> Thanks, and sorry for only spotting this after the offending patch was
> merged.

No worries and thanks for review.

[tip: perf/core] perf tests: Fix a typo

[tip-bot2 for Leo Yan]

The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     b7dc21f546d854aea75245efd88d455f39f5d005
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/b7dc21f546d854aea75245efd88d455f39f5d005
Author:        Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
AuthorDate:    Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:33:24 +08:00
Committer:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
CommitterDate: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 15:43:05 -03:00

perf tests: Fix a typo

Correct typo in comment: s/suck/stuck.

Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Reported-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191023083324.12093-1-leo.yan@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
index 166f411..415903b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void)
 	 * breakpointed instruction.
 	 *
 	 * Since arm64 has the same issue with arm for the single-step
-	 * handling, this case also gets suck on the breakpointed
+	 * handling, this case also gets stuck on the breakpointed
 	 * instruction.
 	 *
 	 * Just disable the test for these architectures until these