From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, broonie@kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org,
stephan@gerhold.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] mfd: mfd-core: Move pdev->mfd_cell creation back into mfd_add_device()
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:56:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191025085622.7gdfbaesiwgnrfd3@holly.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191024163832.31326-11-lee.jones@linaro.org>
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 05:38:32PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Most of the complexity of mfd_platform_add_cell() has been removed. The
> only functionality left duplicates cell memory into the child's platform
> device. Since it's only a few lines, moving it to the main thread and
> removing the superfluous function makes sense.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 21 ++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> index 2535dd3605c0..cb3e0a14bbdd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> @@ -49,19 +49,6 @@ int mfd_cell_disable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mfd_cell_disable);
>
> -static int mfd_platform_add_cell(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - const struct mfd_cell *cell)
> -{
> - if (!cell)
> - return 0;
> -
> - pdev->mfd_cell = kmemdup(cell, sizeof(*cell), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!pdev->mfd_cell)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
> static void mfd_acpi_add_device(const struct mfd_cell *cell,
> struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -141,6 +128,10 @@ static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id,
> if (!pdev)
> goto fail_alloc;
>
> + pdev->mfd_cell = kmemdup(cell, sizeof(*cell), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pdev->mfd_cell)
> + goto fail_device;
> +
> res = kcalloc(cell->num_resources, sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!res)
> goto fail_device;
> @@ -183,10 +174,6 @@ static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id,
> goto fail_alias;
> }
>
> - ret = mfd_platform_add_cell(pdev, cell);
> - if (ret)
> - goto fail_alias;
> -
> for (r = 0; r < cell->num_resources; r++) {
> res[r].name = cell->resources[r].name;
> res[r].flags = cell->resources[r].flags;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-25 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-24 16:38 [PATCH v3 00/10] Simplify MFD Core Lee Jones
2019-10-24 16:38 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Use PLATFORM_DEVID_* defines and tidy error message Lee Jones
2019-10-24 16:38 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Remove mfd_cell->id hack Lee Jones
2019-10-25 8:36 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-24 16:38 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Request shared IO regions centrally Lee Jones
2019-10-25 8:50 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-24 16:38 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] mfd: cs5535-mfd: Register clients using their own dedicated MFD cell entries Lee Jones
2019-10-25 8:50 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-24 16:38 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] mfd: mfd-core: Remove mfd_clone_cell() Lee Jones
2019-10-24 16:38 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] x86: olpc-xo1-pm: Remove invocation of MFD's .enable()/.disable() call-backs Lee Jones
2019-10-25 8:53 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-24 16:38 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] x86: olpc-xo1-sci: " Lee Jones
2019-10-25 8:54 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-24 16:38 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] mfd: mfd-core: Protect against NULL call-back function pointer Lee Jones
2019-10-25 8:52 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-10-25 14:55 ` Mark Brown
2019-10-24 16:38 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] mfd: mfd-core: Remove usage counting for .{en,dis}able() call-backs Lee Jones
2019-10-25 14:55 ` Mark Brown
2019-10-24 16:38 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] mfd: mfd-core: Move pdev->mfd_cell creation back into mfd_add_device() Lee Jones
2019-10-25 8:56 ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
2019-10-25 14:56 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191025085622.7gdfbaesiwgnrfd3@holly.lan \
--to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®