From: Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Rick Lindsley <ricklind@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
nathanl@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/base/memory.c: memory subsys init: skip search for missing blocks
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 14:43:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191102194316.bnglsf5lltc4cztg@rascal.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B456200-E7A1-454E-A70B-92B4A72743C4@redhat.com>
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 11:47:49PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> > Am 01.11.2019 um 23:32 schrieb Rick Lindsley <ricklind@linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> >
> > On 11/1/19 12:00 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> No, I don't really like that. Can we please speed up the lookup via a radix tree as noted in the comment of "find_memory_block()".
> >
> > I agree with the general sentiment that a redesign is the correct long term action - it has been for some time now - but implementing a new storage and retrieval method and verifying that it introduces no new problems itself is non-trivial. There's a reason it remains a comment.
> >
> > I don't see any issues with the patch itself. Do we really want to forego the short term, low-hanging, low risk fruit in favor of waiting indefinitely for that well-tested long-term solution?
>
> The low hanging fruit for me is to convert it to a simple VM_BUG_ON(). As I said, this should never really happen with current code.
>
> Also, I don‘t think adding a radix tree here is rocket science and takes indefinitely ;) feel free to prove me wrong.
To clarify the goal here, "adding a radix tree" means changing
subsys_private's klist_devices member from a klist to a radix
tree or xarray, right?
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-02 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-01 18:10 Scott Cheloha
2019-11-01 19:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-01 19:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-01 22:32 ` Rick Lindsley
2019-11-01 22:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-02 19:43 ` Scott Cheloha [this message]
2019-11-02 20:18 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191102194316.bnglsf5lltc4cztg@rascal.austin.ibm.com \
--to=cheloha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ricklind@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®