mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/speculation: Fix incorrect MDS/TAA mitigation status
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:12:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114201258.GA18745@guptapadev.amr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191113193350.24511-1-longman@redhat.com>

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:33:50PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> For MDS vulnerable processors with TSX support, enabling either MDS
> or TAA mitigations will enable the use of VERW to flush internal
> processor buffers at the right code path. IOW, they are either both
> mitigated or both not mitigated. However, if the command line options
> are inconsistent, the vulnerabilites sysfs files may not report the
> mitigation status correctly.
> 
> For example, with only the "mds=off" option:
> 
>   vulnerabilities/mds:Vulnerable; SMT vulnerable
>   vulnerabilities/tsx_async_abort:Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers; SMT vulnerable
> 
> The mds vulnerabilities file has wrong status in this case.
> 
> Change taa_select_mitigation() to sync up the two mitigation status
> and have them turned off if both "mds=off" and "tsx_async_abort=off"
> are present.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index 4c7b0fa15a19..418d41c1fd0d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -304,8 +304,12 @@ static void __init taa_select_mitigation(void)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* TAA mitigation is turned off on the cmdline (tsx_async_abort=off) */
> -	if (taa_mitigation == TAA_MITIGATION_OFF)
> +	/*
> +	 * TAA mitigation via VERW is turned off if both
> +	 * tsx_async_abort=off and mds=off are specified.
> +	 */
> +	if (taa_mitigation == TAA_MITIGATION_OFF &&
> +	    mds_mitigation == MDS_MITIGATION_OFF)
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MD_CLEAR))
> @@ -339,6 +343,15 @@ static void __init taa_select_mitigation(void)
>  	if (taa_nosmt || cpu_mitigations_auto_nosmt())
>  		cpu_smt_disable(false);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Update MDS mitigation, if necessary, as the mds_user_clear is
> +	 * now enabled for TAA mitigation.
> +	 */
> +	if (mds_mitigation == MDS_MITIGATION_OFF &&
> +	    boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS)) {
> +		mds_mitigation = MDS_MITIGATION_FULL;
> +		mds_select_mitigation();

This will cause a confusing print in dmesg from previous and this call
to mds_select_mitigation().

	"MDS: Vulnerable"
	"MDS: Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers"

Maybe delay MDS mitigation print till TAA is evaluated.

Thanks,
Pawan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-14 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-13 19:33 Waiman Long
2019-11-14 17:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-14 17:53   ` Waiman Long
2019-11-14 18:48     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-11-14 19:11       ` Waiman Long
2019-11-14 20:12 ` Pawan Gupta [this message]
2019-11-14 20:35   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-11-14 21:48     ` Waiman Long
2019-11-14 21:58   ` Waiman Long
2019-11-14 22:09     ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-15 14:40       ` Waiman Long
2019-11-14 23:03     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191114201258.GA18745@guptapadev.amr \
    --to=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®