From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
"Sergey Senozhatsky" <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>,
"Ilya Dryomov" <idryomov@gmail.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Tobin C . Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
"Petr Mladek" <pmladek@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] lib/test_printf: Clean up test of hashed pointers
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:01:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227130123.32442-2-pmladek@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200227130123.32442-1-pmladek@suse.com>
The commit ad67b74d2469d9b82a ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
helps to prevent leaking kernel addresses.
The testing of this functionality is a bit problematic because the output
depends on a random key that is generated during boot. Though, it is
still possible to check some aspects:
+ output string length
+ hash differs from the original pointer value
+ top half bits are zeroed on 64-bit systems
This is currently done by a maze of functions:
+ It is hard to follow.
+ Some code is duplicated, e.g. the check for initialized crng.
+ The zeroed top half bits are tested only with one hardcoded PTR.
+ plain() increments "failed_tests" but not "total_tests".
+ The generic test_hashed() does not touch number of tests at all.
Move all the checks into test_hashed() so that they are done for
any given pointer that should get hashed. Also handle test counters
and internal errors the same way as the existing test() function.
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
---
lib/test_printf.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_printf.c b/lib/test_printf.c
index 2d9f520d2f27..6fa6fb606554 100644
--- a/lib/test_printf.c
+++ b/lib/test_printf.c
@@ -215,29 +215,6 @@ test_string(void)
#define PTR_VAL_NO_CRNG "(____ptrval____)"
#define ZEROS "00000000" /* hex 32 zero bits */
-static int __init
-plain_format(void)
-{
- char buf[PLAIN_BUF_SIZE];
- int nchars;
-
- nchars = snprintf(buf, PLAIN_BUF_SIZE, "%p", PTR);
-
- if (nchars != PTR_WIDTH)
- return -1;
-
- if (strncmp(buf, PTR_VAL_NO_CRNG, PTR_WIDTH) == 0) {
- pr_warn("crng possibly not yet initialized. plain 'p' buffer contains \"%s\"",
- PTR_VAL_NO_CRNG);
- return 0;
- }
-
- if (strncmp(buf, ZEROS, strlen(ZEROS)) != 0)
- return -1;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
#else
#define PTR_WIDTH 8
@@ -246,88 +223,65 @@ plain_format(void)
#define PTR_VAL_NO_CRNG "(ptrval)"
#define ZEROS ""
-static int __init
-plain_format(void)
-{
- /* Format is implicitly tested for 32 bit machines by plain_hash() */
- return 0;
-}
-
#endif /* BITS_PER_LONG == 64 */
-static int __init
-plain_hash_to_buffer(const void *p, char *buf, size_t len)
+static void __init
+test_hashed(const char *fmt, const void *p)
{
+ char real[PLAIN_BUF_SIZE];
+ char hash[PLAIN_BUF_SIZE];
int nchars;
- nchars = snprintf(buf, len, "%p", p);
-
- if (nchars != PTR_WIDTH)
- return -1;
+ total_tests++;
- if (strncmp(buf, PTR_VAL_NO_CRNG, PTR_WIDTH) == 0) {
- pr_warn("crng possibly not yet initialized. plain 'p' buffer contains \"%s\"",
- PTR_VAL_NO_CRNG);
- return 0;
+ nchars = snprintf(real, sizeof(real), "%px", p);
+ if (nchars != PTR_WIDTH) {
+ pr_err("error in test suite: vsprintf(\"%%px\", p) returned number of characters %d, expected %d\n",
+ nchars, PTR_WIDTH);
+ goto err;
}
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int __init
-plain_hash(void)
-{
- char buf[PLAIN_BUF_SIZE];
- int ret;
-
- ret = plain_hash_to_buffer(PTR, buf, PLAIN_BUF_SIZE);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- if (strncmp(buf, PTR_STR, PTR_WIDTH) == 0)
- return -1;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * We can't use test() to test %p because we don't know what output to expect
- * after an address is hashed.
- */
-static void __init
-plain(void)
-{
- int err;
+ nchars = snprintf(hash, sizeof(hash), fmt, p);
+ if (nchars != PTR_WIDTH) {
+ pr_warn("vsprintf(\"%s\", p) returned number of characters %d, expected %d\n",
+ fmt, nchars, PTR_WIDTH);
+ goto err;
+ }
- err = plain_hash();
- if (err) {
- pr_warn("plain 'p' does not appear to be hashed\n");
- failed_tests++;
+ if (strncmp(hash, PTR_VAL_NO_CRNG, PTR_WIDTH) == 0) {
+ pr_warn_once("crng possibly not yet initialized. vsprinf(\"%s\", p) printed \"%s\"",
+ fmt, hash);
+ total_tests--;
return;
}
- err = plain_format();
- if (err) {
- pr_warn("hashing plain 'p' has unexpected format\n");
- failed_tests++;
+ /*
+ * There is a small chance of a false negative on 32-bit systems
+ * when the hash is the same as the pointer value.
+ */
+ if (strncmp(hash, real, PTR_WIDTH) == 0) {
+ pr_warn("vsprintf(\"%s\", p) returned %s, expected hashed pointer\n",
+ fmt, hash);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
+ if (strncmp(hash, ZEROS, PTR_WIDTH / 2) != 0) {
+ pr_warn("vsprintf(\"%s\", p) returned %s, expected %s in the top half bits\n",
+ fmt, hash, ZEROS);
+ goto err;
}
+#endif
+ return;
+
+err:
+ failed_tests++;
}
static void __init
-test_hashed(const char *fmt, const void *p)
+plain(void)
{
- char buf[PLAIN_BUF_SIZE];
- int ret;
-
- /*
- * No need to increase failed test counter since this is assumed
- * to be called after plain().
- */
- ret = plain_hash_to_buffer(p, buf, PLAIN_BUF_SIZE);
- if (ret)
- return;
-
- test(buf, fmt, p);
+ test_hashed("%p", PTR);
}
static void __init
--
2.16.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-27 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-27 13:01 [PATCH 0/3] lib/test_printf: Clean up basic pointer testing Petr Mladek
2020-02-27 13:01 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2020-02-27 14:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] lib/test_printf: Clean up test of hashed pointers Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-02 10:24 ` Petr Mladek
2020-03-03 11:14 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2020-02-27 13:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] lib/test_printf: Fix structure of basic pointer tests Petr Mladek
2020-02-27 13:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] lib/test_printf: Clean up invalid pointer value testing Petr Mladek
2020-03-03 7:24 ` [PATCH 0/3] lib/test_printf: Clean up basic pointer testing Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-03-03 9:22 ` Petr Mladek
2020-03-03 10:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200227130123.32442-2-pmladek@suse.com \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=uwe@kleine-koenig.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®