From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
"Sergey Senozhatsky" <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>,
"Ilya Dryomov" <idryomov@gmail.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Tobin C . Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
"Petr Mladek" <pmladek@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] lib/test_printf: Clean up invalid pointer value testing
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:01:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227130123.32442-4-pmladek@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200227130123.32442-1-pmladek@suse.com>
PTR_INVALID is a confusing name. It might mean any pointer value
that is not accessible. But check_pointer() function is able to
detect only the obviously invalid pointers: NULL pointer,
IS_ERR() range, and the first page.
Check all these three categories by better named values.
Use PTR_STR prefix for all expected output, including
the string used when crng has not been initialized yet.
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
---
lib/test_printf.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_printf.c b/lib/test_printf.c
index 1ee1bb703307..d640be78e3ae 100644
--- a/lib/test_printf.c
+++ b/lib/test_printf.c
@@ -206,13 +206,18 @@ test_string(void)
}
#define PLAIN_BUF_SIZE 64 /* leave some space so we don't oops */
+#define PTR_FIRST_PAGE ((void *)0x000000ab)
+#define PTR_STR_FIRST_PAGE "000000ab"
+#define PTR_ERROR ERR_PTR(-EFAULT)
+#define PTR_STR_ERROR "fffffff2"
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
#define PTR_WIDTH 16
#define PTR ((void *)0xffff0123456789abUL)
#define PTR_STR "ffff0123456789ab"
-#define PTR_VAL_NO_CRNG "(____ptrval____)"
+#define PTR_STR_NO_CRNG "(____ptrval____)"
+#define ONES "ffffffff" /* hex 32 one bits */
#define ZEROS "00000000" /* hex 32 zero bits */
#else
@@ -220,7 +225,8 @@ test_string(void)
#define PTR_WIDTH 8
#define PTR ((void *)0x456789ab)
#define PTR_STR "456789ab"
-#define PTR_VAL_NO_CRNG "(ptrval)"
+#define PTR_STR_NO_CRNG "(ptrval)"
+#define ONES ""
#define ZEROS ""
#endif /* BITS_PER_LONG == 64 */
@@ -248,7 +254,7 @@ test_hashed(const char *fmt, const void *p)
goto err;
}
- if (strncmp(hash, PTR_VAL_NO_CRNG, PTR_WIDTH) == 0) {
+ if (strncmp(hash, PTR_STR_NO_CRNG, PTR_WIDTH) == 0) {
pr_warn_once("crng possibly not yet initialized. vsprinf(\"%s\", p) printed \"%s\"",
fmt, hash);
total_tests--;
@@ -278,22 +284,22 @@ test_hashed(const char *fmt, const void *p)
failed_tests++;
}
-#define PTR_INVALID ((void *)0x000000ab)
-
static void __init
plain_pointer(void)
{
test_hashed("%p", PTR);
test_hashed("%p", NULL);
- test_hashed("%p", PTR_INVALID);
+ test_hashed("%p", PTR_ERROR);
+ test_hashed("%p", PTR_FIRST_PAGE);
}
static void __init
real_pointer(void)
{
test(PTR_STR, "%px", PTR);
- test(ZEROS "00000000", "%px", NULL);
- test(ZEROS "000000ab", "%px", PTR_INVALID);
+ test(ZEROS ZEROS, "%px", NULL);
+ test(ONES PTR_STR_ERROR, "%px", PTR_ERROR);
+ test(ZEROS PTR_STR_FIRST_PAGE, "%px", PTR_FIRST_PAGE);
}
static void __init
@@ -321,7 +327,8 @@ static void __init
escaped_str(void)
{
test("(null)", "%pE", NULL);
- test("(efault)", "%pE", PTR_INVALID);
+ test("(efault)", "%pE", PTR_ERROR);
+ test("(efault)", "%pE", PTR_FIRST_PAGE);
}
static void __init
@@ -408,9 +415,11 @@ dentry(void)
test("foo", "%pd2", &test_dentry[0]);
test("(null)", "%pd", NULL);
- test("(efault)", "%pd", PTR_INVALID);
+ test("(efault)", "%pd", PTR_ERROR);
+ test("(efault)", "%pd", PTR_FIRST_PAGE);
test("(null)", "%pD", NULL);
- test("(efault)", "%pD", PTR_INVALID);
+ test("(efault)", "%pD", PTR_ERROR);
+ test("(efault)", "%pD", PTR_FIRST_PAGE);
test("romeo", "%pd", &test_dentry[3]);
test("alfa/romeo", "%pd2", &test_dentry[3]);
--
2.16.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-27 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-27 13:01 [PATCH 0/3] lib/test_printf: Clean up basic pointer testing Petr Mladek
2020-02-27 13:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] lib/test_printf: Clean up test of hashed pointers Petr Mladek
2020-02-27 14:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-02 10:24 ` Petr Mladek
2020-03-03 11:14 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2020-02-27 13:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] lib/test_printf: Fix structure of basic pointer tests Petr Mladek
2020-02-27 13:01 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2020-03-03 7:24 ` [PATCH 0/3] lib/test_printf: Clean up basic pointer testing Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-03-03 9:22 ` Petr Mladek
2020-03-03 10:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200227130123.32442-4-pmladek@suse.com \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=uwe@kleine-koenig.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®