* Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] scsi: ufs: fix lrbp pointer incorrect initialization issue
2020-03-08 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] " Bean Huo
@ 2020-03-08 21:45 ` Bart Van Assche
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2020-03-08 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bean Huo, alim.akhtar, avri.altman, asutoshd, jejb,
martin.petersen, stanley.chu, beanhuo, tomas.winkler, cang
Cc: linux-scsi, linux-kernel
On 2020-03-08 07:56, Bean Huo wrote:
> The parameter cmd of ufshcd_init_cmd_priv() wasn't given a correct tag
> value while the SCSI layer calls back ufshcd_init_cmd_priv(), this results
> in all pointers of lrbp in UFS driver point to first the lrbp.
>
> As this is just observed, the patch is for reference so others
> who want to use the latest UFS driver can avoid this issue. Any recommend
> is welcomed.
How about also removing ufshcd_init_cmd_priv(), like in the untested patch
below?
Thanks,
Bart.
Subject: [PATCH] ufs: Fix LRB initialization
There are two issues with the ufshcd_init_lrb() call in
ufshcd_init_cmd_priv():
- cmd->tag is set from inside scsi_mq_prep_fn() and hence is not yet set
when ufshcd_init_cmd_priv() is set.
- Inside ufshcd_init_cmd_priv() the tag can only be derived from the SCSI
command pointer if no scheduler has been associated with the UFS block
device. If no scheduler is associated with a block device, the
relationship between hctx->tags->static_rqs[] and rq->tag is static.
If a scheduler has been configured, a single tag can be associated
with a different struct request if a request is reallocated.
Fixes: 34656dda81ac ("ufs: Let the SCSI core allocate per-command UFS data")
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 13 ++++---------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index e987fa3a77c7..1589ba70672f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -2473,6 +2473,8 @@ static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
WARN_ON_ONCE(!ufshcd_is_scsi(cmd->request));
+ ufshcd_init_lrb(hba, lrbp, tag);
+
if (!down_read_trylock(&hba->clk_scaling_lock))
return SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY;
@@ -2707,6 +2709,7 @@ static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
init_completion(&wait);
lrbp = ufshcd_req_to_lrb(req);
+ ufshcd_init_lrb(hba, lrbp, tag);
err = ufshcd_compose_dev_cmd(hba, lrbp, cmd_type, tag);
if (unlikely(err))
goto out_put_tag;
@@ -3504,14 +3507,6 @@ static void ufshcd_host_memory_configure(struct ufs_hba *hba)
}
}
-static int ufshcd_init_cmd_priv(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
-{
- struct ufs_hba *hba = shost_priv(shost);
-
- ufshcd_init_lrb(hba, scsi_cmd_priv(cmd), cmd->tag);
- return 0;
-}
-
/**
* ufshcd_dme_link_startup - Notify Unipro to perform link startup
* @hba: per adapter instance
@@ -5900,6 +5895,7 @@ static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
init_completion(&wait);
lrbp = ufshcd_req_to_lrb(req);
+ ufshcd_init_lrb(hba, lrbp, tag);
lrbp->sense_bufflen = 0;
lrbp->sense_buffer = NULL;
lrbp->task_tag = tag;
@@ -7180,7 +7176,6 @@ static struct scsi_host_template ufshcd_driver_template = {
.module = THIS_MODULE,
.name = UFSHCD,
.proc_name = UFSHCD,
- .init_cmd_priv = ufshcd_init_cmd_priv,
.queuecommand = ufshcd_queuecommand,
.slave_alloc = ufshcd_slave_alloc,
.slave_configure = ufshcd_slave_configure,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread