From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] objtool,ftrace: Implement UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:14:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200401141402.m4klvezp5futb7ff@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200331222703.GH2452@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 12:27:03AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 04:20:40PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 04:17:58PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > I'm not against adding a second/separate hint for this. In fact, I
> > > > almost considered teaching objtool how to interpret the whole IRET frame
> > > > so that we can do it without hints. It's just that that's too much code
> > > > for this one case.
> > > >
> > > > HINT_IRET_SELF ?
> > >
> > > Despite my earlier complaint about stack size knowledge, we could just
> > > forget the hint and make "iretq in C code" equivalent to "reduce stack
> > > size by arch_exception_stack_size()" and keep going. There's
> > > file->c_file which tells you it's a C file.
> >
> > Or maybe "iretq in an STT_FUNC" is better since this pattern could
> > presumably happen in a callable asm function.
>
> Like so then?
I'd suggest a patch split like:
1) objtool: automagic IRET-in-func
2) objtool: add RET_OFFSET
3) ftrace: re-organize asm (and use RET_OFFSET hint)
4) objtool: remove now-unused SAVE/RESTORE
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/orc_types.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/orc_types.h
> @@ -58,8 +58,13 @@
> #define ORC_TYPE_CALL 0
> #define ORC_TYPE_REGS 1
> #define ORC_TYPE_REGS_IRET 2
> -#define UNWIND_HINT_TYPE_SAVE 3
> -#define UNWIND_HINT_TYPE_RESTORE 4
> +
> +/*
> + * RET_OFFSET: Used on instructions that terminate a function; mostly RETURN
> + * and sibling calls. On these, sp_offset denotes the expected offset from
> + * initial_func_cfi.
> + */
> +#define UNWIND_HINT_TYPE_RET_OFFSET 3
I think this comment belongs at the UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET macro
definition.
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> @@ -282,7 +282,8 @@ static inline void tramp_free(void *tram
>
> /* Defined as markers to the end of the ftrace default trampolines */
> extern void ftrace_regs_caller_end(void);
> -extern void ftrace_epilogue(void);
> +extern void ftrace_regs_caller_ret(void);
> +extern void ftrace_caller_end(void);
> extern void ftrace_caller_op_ptr(void);
> extern void ftrace_regs_caller_op_ptr(void);
>
> @@ -334,7 +335,7 @@ create_trampoline(struct ftrace_ops *ops
> call_offset = (unsigned long)ftrace_regs_call;
> } else {
> start_offset = (unsigned long)ftrace_caller;
> - end_offset = (unsigned long)ftrace_epilogue;
> + end_offset = (unsigned long)ftrace_caller_end;
> op_offset = (unsigned long)ftrace_caller_op_ptr;
> call_offset = (unsigned long)ftrace_call;
> }
> @@ -366,6 +367,13 @@ create_trampoline(struct ftrace_ops *ops
> if (WARN_ON(ret < 0))
> goto fail;
>
> + if (ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_SAVE_REGS) {
> + ip = ftrace_regs_caller_ret;
> + ret = probe_kernel_read(ip, (void *)retq, RET_SIZE);
> + if (WARN_ON(ret < 0))
> + goto fail;
> + }
> +
Hm? This function creates a trampoline but it looks like this change is
overwriting the original ftrace_64 code itself?
> --- a/tools/objtool/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/objtool/Makefile
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ INCLUDES := -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
> -I$(srctree)/tools/arch/$(HOSTARCH)/include/uapi \
> -I$(srctree)/tools/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include
> WARNINGS := $(EXTRA_WARNINGS) -Wno-switch-default -Wno-switch-enum -Wno-packed
> -CFLAGS := -Werror $(WARNINGS) $(KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS) -g $(INCLUDES) $(LIBELF_FLAGS)
> +CFLAGS := -Werror $(WARNINGS) $(KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS) -ggdb3 $(INCLUDES) $(LIBELF_FLAGS)
> LDFLAGS += $(LIBELF_LIBS) $(LIBSUBCMD) $(KBUILD_HOSTLDFLAGS)
Why? Smells like a separate patch at least.
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-01 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-25 17:45 [PATCH v4 00/13] objtool: vmlinux.o and moinstr validation Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] objtool: Remove CFI save/restore special case Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-26 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-26 12:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-26 13:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-03-26 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-27 4:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-03-26 14:44 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-03-26 15:04 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-03-26 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-26 13:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-03-26 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-26 19:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-27 1:00 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-03-30 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-30 19:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-03-30 20:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-30 20:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-31 11:16 ` [RFC][PATCH] objtool,ftrace: Implement UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-31 15:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-31 16:06 ` [RFC][PATCH] x86,ftrace: Shrink ftrace_regs_caller() by one byte Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-31 19:58 ` [RFC][PATCH] objtool,ftrace: Implement UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-31 20:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-03-31 20:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-03-31 20:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-31 21:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-31 21:17 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-03-31 21:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-03-31 22:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-01 14:14 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2020-04-01 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-01 14:39 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-01 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-01 15:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-01 15:43 ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-01 17:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-01 17:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-01 17:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-01 18:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-01 20:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-01 17:37 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-02 6:41 ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 6:56 ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 7:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-02 8:16 ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-02 8:29 ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 8:58 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-03-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] objtool: Factor out CFI hints Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-25 18:26 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-03-25 19:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] objtool: Rename struct cfi_state Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] objtool: Fix !CFI insn_state propagation Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] objtool: Implement noinstr validation Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] objtool: Optimize !vmlinux.o again Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] objtool: Use sec_offset_hash() for insn_hash Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] objtool: Detect loading function pointers across noinstr Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] kbuild/objtool: Add objtool-vmlinux.o pass Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] objtool: Avoid iterating !text section symbols Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] objtool: Rearrange validate_section() Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] objtool: Add STT_NOTYPE noinstr validation Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] objtool: Also consider .entry.text as noinstr Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-25 19:03 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] objtool: vmlinux.o and moinstr validation Miroslav Benes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200401141402.m4klvezp5futb7ff@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®