[PATCH] mm/vmalloc: Fix a typo in comment

[PATCH] mm/vmalloc: Fix a typo in comment

[Qiujun Huang]

There is a typo in comment, fix it.
"exeeds" -> "exceeds"

Signed-off-by: Qiujun Huang <hqjagain@gmail.com>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 1f46c3b86f9f..7d90159e84ba 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -3365,7 +3365,7 @@ struct vm_struct **pcpu_get_vm_areas(const unsigned long *offsets,
 			goto overflow;
 
 		/*
-		 * If required width exeeds current VA block, move
+		 * If required width exceeds current VA block, move
 		 * base downwards and then recheck.
 		 */
 		if (base + end > va->va_end) {
-- 
2.17.1

[PATCH] mm/vmalloc: fix a typo in comment

[Jeongtae Park]

There is a typo in comment, fix it.
"nother" -> "another"

Signed-off-by: Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 1e94497b7388..3091c2ca60df 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ static inline void __vfree_deferred(const void *addr)
 	 * Use raw_cpu_ptr() because this can be called from preemptible
 	 * context. Preemption is absolutely fine here, because the llist_add()
 	 * implementation is lockless, so it works even if we are adding to
-	 * nother cpu's list.  schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
+	 * another cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
 	 */
 	struct vfree_deferred *p = raw_cpu_ptr(&vfree_deferred);
 
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: fix a typo in comment

[David Hildenbrand]

On 04.06.20 20:52, Jeongtae Park wrote:
> There is a typo in comment, fix it.
> "nother" -> "another"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@samsung.com>
> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 1e94497b7388..3091c2ca60df 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ static inline void __vfree_deferred(const void *addr)
>  	 * Use raw_cpu_ptr() because this can be called from preemptible
>  	 * context. Preemption is absolutely fine here, because the llist_add()
>  	 * implementation is lockless, so it works even if we are adding to
> -	 * nother cpu's list.  schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
> +	 * another cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
>  	 */
>  	struct vfree_deferred *p = raw_cpu_ptr(&vfree_deferred);
>  
> 

fwiw

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb