mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vito Caputo <vcaputo@pengaru.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question regarding blocking set[ug]id on processes including via suid executables
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 04:30:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200512113035.easefxliufsx54mk@shells.gnugeneration.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512104408.jq3umt5hlqfbuhex@shells.gnugeneration.com>

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 03:44:08AM -0700, Vito Caputo wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:45:24AM -0700, Vito Caputo wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> > 
> > I'm curious if someone knows a way to do this using existing linux
> > interfaces.
> > 
> > I'd like to create a login lacking the ability to switch uid/gid.
> > 
> > Even if the process has access to suid executables like /bin/su, and
> > the user has the root password, I'd like the descendant processes of
> > their login to be simply incapable of changing uid/gid, even when it's
> > in the form of running a program w/suid bit set on an existing and
> > accessible executable in the filesystem.  No matter what, it just
> > can't happen.
> > 
> > Do we have any such thing today?  I'd really like to be able to set
> > this on a specific user and all logins of that user are simply stuck
> > on that uid no matter what.
> > 
> 
> 
> Basically what I'm looking for is a convention for login-time
> application of the PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS prctl, do we have anything
> formalized in userspace for this?  We've got NoNewPrivileges in
> systemd but it's not really user-oriented AFAIK...
> 
> Maybe lkml isn't the right place to pose this question, any pointers
> appreciated though.
> 

For posterity and comment if interested, PAM seems like a reasonable
integration point for this but I don't see any existing support
currently:

https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/224

I'll quit talking to myself on lkml and head to sleep now :)

Regards,
Vito Caputo

      reply	other threads:[~2020-05-12 11:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-12  9:45 Vito Caputo
2020-05-12 10:44 ` Vito Caputo
2020-05-12 11:30   ` Vito Caputo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200512113035.easefxliufsx54mk@shells.gnugeneration.com \
    --to=vcaputo@pengaru.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®