From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Matt Helsley <mhelsley@vmware.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Julien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] objtool: Enable compilation of objtool for all architectures
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 17:27:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200518222754.cp7vh2qp76khfy4r@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200518195045.GQ9040@rlwimi.vmware.com>
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 12:50:45PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > Why were these moved to arch.h? They're not necessarily arch-specific,
> > but rather "check"-specific, so I think they still belong in check.h, if
> > possible.
>
> Ah, found it. They are arch specific due to struct orc_entry, which is
> presently not defined for any archs besides x86.
>
> Prior to the patch (-> means "includes"):
> check.h -> asm/orc_types.h (defines struct orc_entry)
> orc_gen.c -> check,h
>
> After patch:
> check.c -> asm/orc_types.h
> orc_gen.c -> asm/orc_types.h
> orc_gen.c -> check.h
> orc_gen.c -> arch.h
> { now weak.c } -> check.h
>
> So this prevents the headers, which help us keep the weak definitions
> consistent with the strong definitions, from breaking compiles on archs
> that lack struct orc_entry.
>
> I'm not sure what the best way to remove this dependency is without
> a nasty void * for the orc entry, or some #ifdef games related to
> checking for cpp defines from asm/orc_types.h. This approach neatly
> avoids conditional preprocessor games and type casting though I do
> agree it's surprising.
>
> Do you have any advice here?
Would it work if we just move the check() and orc_dump() prototypes to
objtool.h? Then weak.c can just include objtool.h. And check.h and
orc.h would only need to be included for arches which implement them.
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-18 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-11 17:35 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Enable objtool multiarch build Matt Helsley
2020-05-11 17:35 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] objtool: Exit successfully when requesting help Matt Helsley
2020-05-15 19:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-18 18:33 ` Matt Helsley
2020-05-11 17:35 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] objtool: Move struct objtool_file into arch-independent header Matt Helsley
2020-05-12 17:04 ` Julien Thierry
2020-05-12 18:07 ` Matt Helsley
2020-05-11 17:35 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] objtool: Add support for relocations without addends Matt Helsley
2020-05-12 17:04 ` Julien Thierry
2020-05-13 16:26 ` Matt Helsley
2020-05-13 16:55 ` Julien Thierry
2020-05-14 21:09 ` Matt Helsley
2020-05-15 20:33 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-18 19:14 ` Matt Helsley
2020-05-11 17:35 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] objtool: Enable compilation of objtool for all architectures Matt Helsley
2020-05-12 17:04 ` Julien Thierry
2020-05-13 15:59 ` Matt Helsley
2020-05-13 16:55 ` Julien Thierry
2020-05-15 20:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-18 18:26 ` Matt Helsley
2020-05-15 20:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-18 19:20 ` Matt Helsley
2020-05-18 19:50 ` Matt Helsley
2020-05-18 22:27 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2020-05-19 17:48 ` Matt Helsley
2020-05-11 17:35 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] objtool: Report missing support for subcommands Matt Helsley
2020-05-15 21:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-18 18:29 ` Matt Helsley
2020-05-12 17:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Enable objtool multiarch build Julien Thierry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200518222754.cp7vh2qp76khfy4r@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jthierry@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mhelsley@vmware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®