mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
To: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Dmitry Golovin <dima@golovin.in>,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from compressed kernel
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 17:37:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526003703.qr2yq6fgxpl6wcua@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200524212816.243139-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu>

On 2020-05-24, Arvind Sankar wrote:
>The compressed kernel currently contains bogus runtime relocations in
>the startup code in head_{32,64}.S, which are generated by the linker,
>but must not actually be processed at runtime.
>
>This generates warnings when linking with the BFD linker, and errors
>with LLD, which defaults to erroring on runtime relocations in read-only
>sections. It also requires the -z noreloc-overflow hack for the 64-bit
>kernel, which prevents us from linking it as -pie on an older BFD linker
>(<= 2.26) or on LLD, because the locations that are to be apparently
>relocated are only 32-bits in size and so cannot normally have
>R_X86_64_RELATIVE relocations.
>
>This series aims to get rid of these relocations. It is based on
>efi/next (efi-changes-for-v5.8), where the latest patches touch the
>head code to eliminate the global offset table.
>
>The first patch is an independent fix for LLD, to avoid an orphan
>section in arch/x86/boot/setup.elf [0].
>
>The second patch gets rid of almost all the relocations. It uses
>standard PIC addressing technique for 32-bit, i.e. loading a register
>with the address of _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ and then using GOTOFF
>references to access variables. For 64-bit, there is 32-bit code that
>cannot use RIP-relative addressing, and also cannot use the 32-bit
>method, since GOTOFF references are 64-bit only. This is instead handled
>using a macro to replace a reference like gdt with (gdt-startup_32)
>instead. The assembler will generate a PC32 relocation entry, with
>addend set to (.-startup_32), and these will be replaced with constants
>at link time. This works as long as all the code using such references
>lives in the same section as startup_32, i.e. in .head.text.
>
>The third patch addresses a remaining issue with the BFD linker, which
>insists on generating runtime relocations for absolute symbols. We use
>z_input_len and z_output_len, defined in the generated piggy.S file, as
>symbols whose absolute "addresses" are actually the size of the
>compressed payload and the size of the decompressed kernel image
>respectively. LLD does not generate relocations for these two symbols,
>but the BFD linker does. To get around this, piggy.S is extended to also
>define two u32 variables (in .rodata) with the lengths, and the head
>code is modified to use those instead of the symbol addresses.
>
>An alternative way to handle z_input_len/z_output_len would be to just
>include piggy.S in head_{32,64}.S instead of as a separate object file,
>since the GNU assembler doesn't generate relocations for symbols set to
>constants.
>
>The last patch adds a check in the linker script to ensure that no
>runtime relocations get reintroduced. Since the GOT has been eliminated
>as well, the compressed kernel has no runtime relocations whatsoever any
>more.
>
>[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200521152459.558081-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu/
>
>Arvind Sankar (4):
>  x86/boot: Add .text.startup to setup.ld
>  x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from .head.text code
>  x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from head_{32,64}.S
>  x86/boot: Check that there are no runtime relocations
>
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/Makefile      | 36 +---------
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.S     | 59 +++++++--------
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S     | 99 +++++++++++++++-----------
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/mkpiggy.c     |  6 ++
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds.S | 11 +++
> arch/x86/boot/setup.ld                 |  2 +-
> 6 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
>
>-- 
>2.26.2

All 4 commits look good.

Reviewed-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-26  0:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-01  8:42 [PATCH] x86/boot: allow a relocatable kernel to be linked with lld Dmitry Golovin
2020-05-02  3:43 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-05-15 18:50 ` Borislav Petkov
     [not found]   ` <602331589572661@mail.yandex.ru>
2020-05-17 19:44     ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-17 20:25       ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-18 19:10         ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-05-24 21:28           ` [PATCH 0/4] x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from compressed kernel Arvind Sankar
2020-05-25  7:10             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-05-25 22:59             ` [PATCH v2 " Arvind Sankar
2020-05-26 12:29               ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 12:30                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-05-26 12:33                   ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 12:44                     ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 14:47                       ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-26 14:50                         ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 15:36                           ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-26 15:38                             ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-27  6:26                             ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 14:48                       ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 14:55                         ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 15:07                           ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 15:31                             ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-27  6:24                               ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 16:18                             ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-25 22:59             ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/boot: Add .text.* to setup.ld Arvind Sankar
2020-05-25 22:59             ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86/boot: Remove run-time relocations from .head.text code Arvind Sankar
2020-05-25 22:59             ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from head_{32,64}.S Arvind Sankar
2020-05-25 22:59             ` [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/boot: Check that there are no runtime relocations Arvind Sankar
2020-05-26  6:11               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-05-26 15:16                 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-26 17:13                   ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-26 19:14                     ` Arvind Sankar
2020-08-06 11:19                       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-08-06 16:12                         ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-26  0:37             ` Fangrui Song [this message]
2020-05-24 21:28           ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/boot: Add .text.startup to setup.ld Arvind Sankar
2020-05-24 22:13             ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-24 23:00               ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-24 23:49                 ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-24 22:48             ` Brian Gerst
2020-05-24 21:28           ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from .head.text code Arvind Sankar
2020-05-24 22:53             ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-24 23:44               ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-25  0:55                 ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-24 21:28           ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from head_{32,64}.S Arvind Sankar
2020-05-24 23:22             ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-24 23:58               ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-24 21:28           ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/boot: Check that there are no runtime relocations Arvind Sankar
2020-05-24 23:36             ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-24 23:57               ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-25  6:10             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-05-25 16:26               ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-25 19:22                 ` Arvind Sankar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200526003703.qr2yq6fgxpl6wcua@google.com \
    --to=maskray@google.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
    --cc=dima@golovin.in \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®