[PATCH] sched: Fix race against ptrace_freeze_trace()

[peterz@infradead.org]

There is apparently one site that violates the rule that only current
and ttwu() will modify task->state, namely ptrace_{,un}freeze_traced()
will change task->state for a remote task.

Oleg explains:

  "TASK_TRACED/TASK_STOPPED was always protected by siglock. In
particular, ttwu(__TASK_TRACED) must be always called with siglock
held. That is why ptrace_freeze_traced() assumes it can safely do
s/TASK_TRACED/__TASK_TRACED/ under spin_lock(siglock)."

This breaks the ordering scheme introduced by commit:

  dbfb089d360b ("sched: Fix loadavg accounting race")

Specifically, the reload not matching no longer implies we don't have
to block.

Simply things by noting that what we need is a LOAD->STORE ordering
and this can be provided by a control dependency.

So replace:

	prev_state = prev->state;
	raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
	smp_mb__after_spinlock(); /* SMP-MB */
	if (... && prev_state && prev_state == prev->state)
		deactivate_task();

with:

	prev_state = prev->state;
	if (... && prev_state) /* CTRL-DEP */
		deactivate_task();

Since that already implies the 'prev->state' load must be complete
before allowing the 'prev->on_rq = 0' store to become visible.

Fixes: dbfb089d360b ("sched: Fix loadavg accounting race")
Reported-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
---
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4193,9 +4193,6 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(b
 	local_irq_disable();
 	rcu_note_context_switch(preempt);
 
-	/* See deactivate_task() below. */
-	prev_state = prev->state;
-
 	/*
 	 * Make sure that signal_pending_state()->signal_pending() below
 	 * can't be reordered with __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
@@ -4219,11 +4216,16 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(b
 	update_rq_clock(rq);
 
 	switch_count = &prev->nivcsw;
+
 	/*
-	 * We must re-load prev->state in case ttwu_remote() changed it
-	 * before we acquired rq->lock.
+	 * We must load prev->state once (task_struct::state is volatile), such
+	 * that:
+	 *
+	 *  - we form a control dependency vs deactivate_task() below.
+	 *  - ptrace_{,un}freeze_traced() can change ->state underneath us.
 	 */
-	if (!preempt && prev_state && prev_state == prev->state) {
+	prev_state = prev->state;
+	if (!preempt && prev_state) {
 		if (signal_pending_state(prev_state, prev)) {
 			prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
 		} else {
@@ -4237,10 +4239,12 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(b
 
 			/*
 			 * __schedule()			ttwu()
-			 *   prev_state = prev->state;	  if (READ_ONCE(p->on_rq) && ...)
-			 *   LOCK rq->lock		    goto out;
-			 *   smp_mb__after_spinlock();	  smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
-			 *   p->on_rq = 0;		  p->state = TASK_WAKING;
+			 *   if (prev_state)		  if (p->on_rq && ...)
+			 *     p->on_rq = 0;		    goto out;
+			 *				  smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
+			 *				  p->state = TASK_WAKING
+			 *
+			 * Where __schedule() and ttwu() have matching control dependencies.
 			 *
 			 * After this, schedule() must not care about p->state any more.
 			 */