From: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: add missing EXPORT_SYMBOL() for __delay
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:52:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200722225239.GX14669@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200722023840.GA55317@roeck-us.net>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 07:38:40PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:38:43AM +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> > From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
> >
> > __delay() is used from kernel module.
> > We need EXPORT_SYMBOL(), otherwise we will get compile error.
> >
> > ERROR: "__delay" [drivers/net/phy/mdio-cavium.ko] undefined!
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
>
> I must admit that this patch completely baffles me. __delay was
> already exported, only elsewhere in the file. With this patch
> in place, it is exported twice, and all sh builds in -next fail
> with
>
> In file included from include/linux/linkage.h:7,
> from arch/sh/include/asm/bug.h:5,
> from include/linux/bug.h:5,
> from include/linux/thread_info.h:12,
> from include/asm-generic/current.h:5,
> from ./arch/sh/include/generated/asm/current.h:1,
> from include/linux/sched.h:12,
> from arch/sh/lib/delay.c:8:
> include/linux/export.h:67:36: error: redefinition of '__ksymtab___delay'
>
> Guenter
>
> > ---
> > arch/sh/lib/delay.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/sh/lib/delay.c b/arch/sh/lib/delay.c
> > index dad8e6a..540e670 100644
> > --- a/arch/sh/lib/delay.c
> > +++ b/arch/sh/lib/delay.c
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ void __delay(unsigned long loops)
> > : "0" (loops)
> > : "t");
> > }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);
> >
> > inline void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
> > {
I presently have a revert of this commit in queue for next. If it's
sufficiently breaking (and especially if there are other regressions
that need to be fixed, see the pmd_free thing) I could try to get it
in for 5.8 still but that's getting a bit late.
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-22 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-12 2:38 Kuninori Morimoto
2019-12-12 7:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-12-12 23:57 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2019-12-16 11:28 ` Yoshinori Sato
2020-07-22 2:38 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-07-22 22:52 ` Rich Felker [this message]
2020-07-22 23:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-07-24 19:44 ` Rich Felker
2020-07-24 23:25 ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-03 10:01 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-12-12 2:34 morimoto
2019-12-12 2:36 ` Kuninori Morimoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200722225239.GX14669@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
--to=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®