From: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
To: jbaron@akamai.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] dyndbg: add locking around zpool-add loop in zpool-init
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 14:09:53 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200807200957.1269454-7-jim.cromie@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200807200957.1269454-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
This commit doesnt improve things, last commit was working, next one
still breaks, despite this "fix". I keep it separate for the
following review, which now stated, will be refuted as needed. ;-)
Locking review:
ddebug_zpool_init(), like other *_init() routines, does no locking
itself. Unlike them, it runs later, at late_init. This patch doesnt
fix the kernel panic that HEAD+1 does.
ddebug_callsite_get/put() are called as a pair under mutex-lock for
all 3 callsite users, 2: ddebug_change(), dynamic_emit_prefix(), do
their own ABBA-ish LGPU (Lock-Get-Put-Unlock).
ddebug_proc_show() does the GP part, and is wrapped by
ddebug_proc_start|stop() with LU.
ddebug_add_module() does LU to protect list_add(), HEAD~1 added
ddebug_zpool_add() loop inside that protection.
This commit adds locking to ddebug_zpool_init(), around the loop of
ddebug_zpool_add(), to match the locking in ddebug_add_module().
Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
---
lib/dynamic_debug.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/dynamic_debug.c b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
index fdf52a26a504..701d3d1fb7e7 100644
--- a/lib/dynamic_debug.c
+++ b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
@@ -1182,8 +1182,10 @@ static void __init ddebug_zpool_init(void)
}
/* add-module normally does this, but not in time for builtins */
+ mutex_lock(&ddebug_lock);
for (iter = __start___dyndbg; iter < __stop___dyndbg; iter++)
ddebug_zpool_add(iter);
+ mutex_unlock(&ddebug_lock);
v2pr_info("total pages: %lu compaction: %lu\n",
zs_get_total_pages(dd_callsite_zpool),
@@ -1280,4 +1282,3 @@ early_initcall(dynamic_debug_init);
/* Debugfs setup must be done later */
fs_initcall(dynamic_debug_init_control);
-
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-07 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-07 20:09 [PATCH 0/7] dyndbg: WIP diet plan Jim Cromie
2020-08-07 20:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] dyndbg: give %3u width in pr-format, cosmetic only Jim Cromie
2020-08-07 20:09 ` [PATCH 2/7] dyndbg: motivate a diet plan Jim Cromie
2020-08-07 20:09 ` [PATCH 3/7] dyndbg: select ZPOOL in Kconfig.debug Jim Cromie
2020-08-09 5:05 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-08-09 15:09 ` jim.cromie
2020-08-07 20:09 ` [PATCH 4/7] dyndbg: split struct _ddebug in 2, creating _ddebug_callsite Jim Cromie
2020-08-07 20:09 ` [PATCH 5/7] dyndbg: WIP replace __dyndbg_callsite section with a zs-pool copy Jim Cromie
2020-08-07 23:50 ` kernel test robot
2020-08-07 20:09 ` Jim Cromie [this message]
2020-08-07 20:09 ` [PATCH 6/8] dyndbg: ddebug_zpool_remove Jim Cromie
2020-08-07 20:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] dyndbg: enable 'cache' of active pr_debug callsites Jim Cromie
2020-08-09 4:35 ` [dyndbg] 4397a3e7bf: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/slab.h kernel test robot
2020-08-12 15:11 ` jim.cromie
2020-08-07 20:09 ` [PATCH 8/8] dyndbg: add locking around zpool-add loop in zpool-init Jim Cromie
[not found] <20201125193626.2266995-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
2020-11-25 19:36 ` [PATCH 6/7] " Jim Cromie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200807200957.1269454-7-jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--to=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®