From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, ming.lei@redhat.com, hch@lst.de,
baolin.wang7@gmail.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/5] block: Add a new helper to attempt to merge a bio
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 08:26:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200817062634.GC12248@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b932aa51fc2b46c381d7b83d591a6ddbf05b199.1597637287.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:09:17PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> There are lots of duplicated code when trying to merge a bio from
> plug list and sw queue, we can introduce a new helper to attempt
> to merge a bio, which can simplify the blk_mq_bio_list_merge()
> and blk_attempt_plug_merge().
Looks sensible, but two comments:
> +enum bio_merge_status blk_attempt_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q,
> + struct request *rq,
> + struct bio *bio,
> + unsigned int nr_segs)
> +{
> + bool merged = false;
> +
> + if (!blk_rq_merge_ok(rq, bio))
> + return BIO_MERGE_NONE;
> +
> + switch (blk_try_merge(rq, bio)) {
> + case ELEVATOR_BACK_MERGE:
> + merged = bio_attempt_back_merge(rq, bio, nr_segs);
> + break;
> + case ELEVATOR_FRONT_MERGE:
> + merged = bio_attempt_front_merge(rq, bio, nr_segs);
> + break;
> + case ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE:
> + merged = bio_attempt_discard_merge(q, rq, bio);
> + break;
Can't we also switch the bio_attempt_*merge helpers to return
enum bio_merge_status to simplify this a bit?
Also I think these helpers can be marked static now, although I didn't
actually apply your series, so I might have missed something.
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> @@ -391,31 +391,17 @@ bool blk_mq_bio_list_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
> {
> struct request *rq;
> int checked = 8;
> + enum bio_merge_status merge;
>
> list_for_each_entry_reverse(rq, list, queuelist) {
> - bool merged = false;
> -
> if (!checked--)
> break;
>
> + merge = blk_attempt_bio_merge(q, rq, bio, nr_segs);
> + if (merge == BIO_MERGE_NONE)
> continue;
>
> + return merge == BIO_MERGE_OK ? true: false;
Maybe write this a little more explicit:
switch (blk_attempt_bio_merge(q, rq, bio, nr_segs)) {
case BIO_MERGE_NONE:
continue:
case BIO_MERGE_OK:
return true;
case BIO_MERGE_FAILED:
return false;
}
> enum elv_merge blk_try_merge(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio);
>
> +enum bio_merge_status {
> + BIO_MERGE_OK,
> + BIO_MERGE_NONE,
> + BIO_MERGE_FAILED,
> +};
> +
> +enum bio_merge_status blk_attempt_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q,
> + struct request *rq, struct bio *bio, unsigned int nr_segs);
> +
> int blk_dev_init(void);
>
> /*
> --
> 1.8.3.1
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-17 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-17 4:09 [PATCH RESEND 0/5] Some clean-ups for bio merge Baolin Wang
2020-08-17 4:09 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/5] block: Move bio merge related functions into blk-merge.c Baolin Wang
2020-08-17 6:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 4:09 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/5] block: Remove redundant blk_mq_sched_allow_merge() validation Baolin Wang
2020-08-17 6:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 12:06 ` Baolin Wang
2020-08-17 4:09 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/5] block: Add a new helper to attempt to merge a bio Baolin Wang
2020-08-17 6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-08-17 12:10 ` Baolin Wang
2020-08-17 12:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 3:30 ` Baolin Wang
2020-08-17 7:55 ` [PATCH] block: fix boolconv.cocci warnings kernel test robot
2020-08-17 7:55 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/5] block: Add a new helper to attempt to merge a bio kernel test robot
2020-08-17 4:09 ` [PATCH RESEND 4/5] block: Remove blk_mq_attempt_merge() function Baolin Wang
2020-08-17 6:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 12:10 ` Baolin Wang
2020-08-17 4:09 ` [PATCH RESEND 5/5] block: Remove __blk_mq_sched_bio_merge() helper Baolin Wang
2020-08-17 6:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-17 12:14 ` Baolin Wang
2020-08-17 12:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-18 3:29 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200817062634.GC12248@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome