[PATCH 2/2] drivers:staging:comedi:comedi.h Fixed typo in comment

[PATCH 2/2] drivers:staging:comedi:comedi.h Fixed typo in comment

[James Browning]

Removed repeated word "in"

Signed-off-by: James Browning <jamesbrowning137@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/comedi/comedi.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/comedi.h b/drivers/staging/comedi/comedi.h
index 3bc74bea830d..b5d00a006dbb 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/comedi/comedi.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/comedi.h
@@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ enum i8254_mode {
  *   major reasons exist why this caused major confusion for users:
  *   1) The register values are _NOT_ in user documentation, but rather in
  *     arcane locations, such as a few register programming manuals that are
- *     increasingly hard to find and the NI MHDDK (comments in in example code).
+ *     increasingly hard to find and the NI MHDDK (comments in example code).
  *     There is no one place to find the various valid values of the registers.
  *   2) The register values are _NOT_ completely consistent.  There is no way to
  *     gain any sense of intuition of which values, or even enums one should use
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers:staging:comedi:comedi.h Fixed typo in comment

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 09:14:49PM -0700, James Browning wrote:
> Removed repeated word "in"
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Browning <jamesbrowning137@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/comedi/comedi.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

You sent two different patches that did different things, yet had the
same exact subject line, which isn't ok.

Why not just merge them into the same patch?

thanks,

greg k-h