From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To: "André Przywara" <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Grant <Al.Grant@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor payload length calculation
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 08:21:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201012002102.GB15194@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <995b40af-13b9-faef-fb3b-235f04289eb5@arm.com>
Hi Andre,
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 02:44:59PM +0100, André Przywara wrote:
> On 29/09/2020 14:39, Leo Yan wrote:
>
> Hi Leo,
>
> > Defines macro for payload length calculation instead of static function.
>
> What is the reason for that? I thought the kernel's direction is more
> the other way: replacing macros with static functions ("Don't write CPP,
> write C")? Ideally the compiler would generate the same code.
Okay, I didn't note this before. Will change back to use static
function.
> > Currently the event packet's 'index' is assigned as payload length, but
> > the flow is not directive: it firstly gets the packet length (includes
> > header length and payload length) and then reduces header length from
> > packet length, so finally get the payload length; to simplify the code,
> > this patch directly assigns payload length to event packet's index.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > .../arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c | 26 ++++++++-----------
> > .../arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h | 4 +++
> > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > index 7c7b5eb09fba..5a8696031e16 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > @@ -69,22 +69,20 @@ const char *arm_spe_pkt_name(enum arm_spe_pkt_type type)
> > return arm_spe_packet_name[type];
> > }
> >
> > -/* return ARM SPE payload size from its encoding,
> > - * which is in bits 5:4 of the byte.
> > - * 00 : byte
> > - * 01 : halfword (2)
> > - * 10 : word (4)
> > - * 11 : doubleword (8)
> > +/*
> > + * Return ARM SPE payload size from header bits 5:4
> > + * 00 : byte
> > + * 01 : halfword (2)
> > + * 10 : word (4)
> > + * 11 : doubleword (8)
> > */
> > -static int payloadlen(unsigned char byte)
> > -{
> > - return 1 << ((byte & 0x30) >> 4);
> > -}
> > +#define PAYLOAD_LEN(val) \
> > + (1 << (((val) & SPE_HEADER_SZ_MASK) >> SPE_HEADER_SZ_SHIFT))
>
> This change of the expression is good (although it should be 1U), but
> please keep it a function. The return type should be unsigned, I guess.
Will do.
> The rest looks fine.
Thanks a lot for reviewing!
Leo
> Cheers,
> Andre
>
> >
> > static int arm_spe_get_payload(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> > struct arm_spe_pkt *packet)
> > {
> > - size_t payload_len = payloadlen(buf[0]);
> > + size_t payload_len = PAYLOAD_LEN(buf[0]);
> >
> > if (len < 1 + payload_len)
> > return ARM_SPE_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
> > @@ -136,8 +134,6 @@ static int arm_spe_get_timestamp(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> > static int arm_spe_get_events(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> > struct arm_spe_pkt *packet)
> > {
> > - int ret = arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, packet);
> > -
> > packet->type = ARM_SPE_EVENTS;
> >
> > /* we use index to identify Events with a less number of
> > @@ -145,9 +141,9 @@ static int arm_spe_get_events(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> > * LLC-REFILL, and REMOTE-ACCESS events are identified if
> > * index > 1.
> > */
> > - packet->index = ret - 1;
> > + packet->index = PAYLOAD_LEN(buf[0]);
> >
> > - return ret;
> > + return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, packet);
> > }
> >
> > static int arm_spe_get_data_source(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> > index 4c870521b8eb..f2d0af39a58c 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> >
> > #include <stddef.h>
> > #include <stdint.h>
> > +#include <linux/bits.h>
> >
> > #define ARM_SPE_PKT_DESC_MAX 256
> >
> > @@ -36,6 +37,9 @@ struct arm_spe_pkt {
> > uint64_t payload;
> > };
> >
> > +#define SPE_HEADER_SZ_SHIFT (4)
> > +#define SPE_HEADER_SZ_MASK GENMASK_ULL(5, 4)
> > +
> > #define SPE_ADDR_PKT_HDR_INDEX_INS (0x0)
> > #define SPE_ADDR_PKT_HDR_INDEX_BRANCH (0x1)
> > #define SPE_ADDR_PKT_HDR_INDEX_DATA_VIRT (0x2)
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-12 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-29 13:39 [PATCH v2 00/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor decoding & dumping flow Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] perf arm-spe: Include bitops.h for BIT() macro Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:44 ` André Przywara
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] perf arm-spe: Fix a typo in comment Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:44 ` André Przywara
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor payload length calculation Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:44 ` André Przywara
2020-10-12 0:21 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] perf arm-spe: Fix packet length handling Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:45 ` André Przywara
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor printing string to buffer Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:46 ` André Przywara
2020-10-12 0:29 ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor packet header parsing Leo Yan
2020-10-08 19:49 ` André Przywara
2020-10-12 1:00 ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor address packet handling Leo Yan
2020-10-19 9:01 ` André Przywara
2020-10-19 10:41 ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor context " Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:53 ` André Przywara
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor counter " Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:53 ` André Przywara
2020-10-21 3:52 ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor event type handling Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:54 ` André Przywara
2020-10-21 4:54 ` Leo Yan
2020-10-21 9:20 ` André Przywara
2020-10-21 10:13 ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor operation packet handling Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] perf arm-spe: Add more sub classes for operation packet Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:54 ` André Przywara
2020-10-21 5:16 ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] perf arm_spe: Decode memory tagging properties Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] perf arm-spe: Add support for ARMv8.3-SPE Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:54 ` André Przywara
2020-10-21 5:10 ` Leo Yan
2020-10-21 9:26 ` André Przywara
2020-10-21 10:17 ` Leo Yan
2020-10-21 14:53 ` André Przywara
2020-10-22 0:44 ` Leo Yan
2020-10-13 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor decoding & dumping flow Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-10-13 15:19 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201012002102.GB15194@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s \
--to=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=Al.Grant@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®