From: "André Przywara" <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Grant <Al.Grant@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/14] perf arm-spe: Fix packet length handling
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:45:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <230f6fbf-02b4-1ce2-bf80-3cbaa16fb587@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200929133917.9224-5-leo.yan@linaro.org>
On 29/09/2020 14:39, Leo Yan wrote:
> When process address packet and counter packet, if the packet contains
processing
> extended header, it misses to account the extra one byte for header
> length calculation, thus returns the wrong packet length.
>
> To correct the packet length calculation, one possible fixing is simply
> to plus extra 1 for extended header, but will spread some duplicate code
> in the flows for processing address packet and counter packet.
> Alternatively, we can refine the function arm_spe_get_payload() to not
> only support short header and allow it to support extended header, and
> rely on it for the packet length calculation.
>
> So this patch refactors function arm_spe_get_payload() with a new
> argument 'ext_hdr' for support extended header; the packet processing
> flows can invoke this function to unify the packet length calculation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
That looks alright to me.
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cheers,
Andre
> ---
> .../arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c | 34 +++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> index 5a8696031e16..4f0aeb62e97b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> @@ -80,14 +80,15 @@ const char *arm_spe_pkt_name(enum arm_spe_pkt_type type)
> (1 << (((val) & SPE_HEADER_SZ_MASK) >> SPE_HEADER_SZ_SHIFT))
>
> static int arm_spe_get_payload(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> + unsigned char ext_hdr,
> struct arm_spe_pkt *packet)
> {
> - size_t payload_len = PAYLOAD_LEN(buf[0]);
> + size_t payload_len = PAYLOAD_LEN(buf[ext_hdr]);
>
> - if (len < 1 + payload_len)
> + if (len < 1 + ext_hdr + payload_len)
> return ARM_SPE_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
>
> - buf++;
> + buf += 1 + ext_hdr;
>
> switch (payload_len) {
> case 1: packet->payload = *(uint8_t *)buf; break;
> @@ -97,7 +98,7 @@ static int arm_spe_get_payload(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> default: return ARM_SPE_BAD_PACKET;
> }
>
> - return 1 + payload_len;
> + return 1 + ext_hdr + payload_len;
> }
>
> static int arm_spe_get_pad(struct arm_spe_pkt *packet)
> @@ -128,7 +129,7 @@ static int arm_spe_get_timestamp(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> struct arm_spe_pkt *packet)
> {
> packet->type = ARM_SPE_TIMESTAMP;
> - return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, packet);
> + return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, 0, packet);
> }
>
> static int arm_spe_get_events(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> @@ -143,14 +144,14 @@ static int arm_spe_get_events(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> */
> packet->index = PAYLOAD_LEN(buf[0]);
>
> - return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, packet);
> + return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, 0, packet);
> }
>
> static int arm_spe_get_data_source(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> struct arm_spe_pkt *packet)
> {
> packet->type = ARM_SPE_DATA_SOURCE;
> - return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, packet);
> + return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, 0, packet);
> }
>
> static int arm_spe_get_context(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> @@ -158,8 +159,7 @@ static int arm_spe_get_context(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> {
> packet->type = ARM_SPE_CONTEXT;
> packet->index = buf[0] & 0x3;
> -
> - return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, packet);
> + return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, 0, packet);
> }
>
> static int arm_spe_get_op_type(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> @@ -167,41 +167,31 @@ static int arm_spe_get_op_type(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> {
> packet->type = ARM_SPE_OP_TYPE;
> packet->index = buf[0] & 0x3;
> - return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, packet);
> + return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, 0, packet);
> }
>
> static int arm_spe_get_counter(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> const unsigned char ext_hdr, struct arm_spe_pkt *packet)
> {
> - if (len < 2)
> - return ARM_SPE_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
> -
> packet->type = ARM_SPE_COUNTER;
> if (ext_hdr)
> packet->index = ((buf[0] & 0x3) << 3) | (buf[1] & 0x7);
> else
> packet->index = buf[0] & 0x7;
>
> - packet->payload = le16_to_cpu(*(uint16_t *)(buf + 1));
> -
> - return 1 + ext_hdr + 2;
> + return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, ext_hdr, packet);
> }
>
> static int arm_spe_get_addr(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> const unsigned char ext_hdr, struct arm_spe_pkt *packet)
> {
> - if (len < 8)
> - return ARM_SPE_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
> -
> packet->type = ARM_SPE_ADDRESS;
> if (ext_hdr)
> packet->index = ((buf[0] & 0x3) << 3) | (buf[1] & 0x7);
> else
> packet->index = buf[0] & 0x7;
>
> - memcpy_le64(&packet->payload, buf + 1, 8);
> -
> - return 1 + ext_hdr + 8;
> + return arm_spe_get_payload(buf, len, ext_hdr, packet);
> }
>
> static int arm_spe_do_get_packet(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-08 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-29 13:39 [PATCH v2 00/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor decoding & dumping flow Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] perf arm-spe: Include bitops.h for BIT() macro Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:44 ` André Przywara
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] perf arm-spe: Fix a typo in comment Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:44 ` André Przywara
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor payload length calculation Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:44 ` André Przywara
2020-10-12 0:21 ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] perf arm-spe: Fix packet length handling Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:45 ` André Przywara [this message]
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor printing string to buffer Leo Yan
2020-10-08 13:46 ` André Przywara
2020-10-12 0:29 ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor packet header parsing Leo Yan
2020-10-08 19:49 ` André Przywara
2020-10-12 1:00 ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor address packet handling Leo Yan
2020-10-19 9:01 ` André Przywara
2020-10-19 10:41 ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor context " Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:53 ` André Przywara
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor counter " Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:53 ` André Przywara
2020-10-21 3:52 ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor event type handling Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:54 ` André Przywara
2020-10-21 4:54 ` Leo Yan
2020-10-21 9:20 ` André Przywara
2020-10-21 10:13 ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor operation packet handling Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] perf arm-spe: Add more sub classes for operation packet Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:54 ` André Przywara
2020-10-21 5:16 ` Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] perf arm_spe: Decode memory tagging properties Leo Yan
2020-09-29 13:39 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] perf arm-spe: Add support for ARMv8.3-SPE Leo Yan
2020-10-20 21:54 ` André Przywara
2020-10-21 5:10 ` Leo Yan
2020-10-21 9:26 ` André Przywara
2020-10-21 10:17 ` Leo Yan
2020-10-21 14:53 ` André Przywara
2020-10-22 0:44 ` Leo Yan
2020-10-13 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] perf arm-spe: Refactor decoding & dumping flow Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-10-13 15:19 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=230f6fbf-02b4-1ce2-bf80-3cbaa16fb587@arm.com \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=Al.Grant@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®