From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: remove the calling of local_memory_node()
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 13:40:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201019114011.GE27114@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201019082047.31113-1-tian.xianting@h3c.com>
On Mon 19-10-20 16:20:47, Xianting Tian wrote:
> We don't need to check whether the node is memoryless numa node before
> calling allocator interface. SLUB(and SLAB,SLOB) relies on the page
> allocator to pick a node. Page allocator should deal with memoryless
> nodes just fine. It has zonelists constructed for each possible nodes.
> And it will automatically fall back into a node which is closest to the
> requested node. As long as __GFP_THISNODE is not enforced of course.
>
> The code comments of kmem_cache_alloc_node() of SLAB also showed this:
> * Fallback to other node is possible if __GFP_THISNODE is not set.
>
> blk-mq code doesn't set __GFP_THISNODE, so we can remove the calling
> of local_memory_node().
yes, this is indeed the case. I cannot really judge the blg-mq code but
it seems to be unnecessary. Maybe there are some subtle details not
explained by bffed457160ab though.
> Fixes: bffed457160ab ("blk-mq: Avoid memoryless numa node encoded in hctx numa_node")
But the existing code is not broken. It just overdoes what needs to be
done. So effectively bffed457160ab was not needed. I do not think that
Fixes is really necessary.
> Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@h3c.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-cpumap.c | 2 +-
> block/blk-mq.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> index 0157f2b34..3db84d319 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int blk_mq_hw_queue_to_node(struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap, unsigned int index)
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> if (index == qmap->mq_map[i])
> - return local_memory_node(cpu_to_node(i));
> + return cpu_to_node(i);
> }
>
> return NUMA_NO_NODE;
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index cdced4aca..48f8366b2 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2737,7 +2737,7 @@ static void blk_mq_init_cpu_queues(struct request_queue *q,
> for (j = 0; j < set->nr_maps; j++) {
> hctx = blk_mq_map_queue_type(q, j, i);
> if (nr_hw_queues > 1 && hctx->numa_node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> - hctx->numa_node = local_memory_node(cpu_to_node(i));
> + hctx->numa_node = cpu_to_node(i);
> }
> }
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-19 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-19 8:20 Xianting Tian
2020-10-19 11:40 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2020-10-20 2:52 ` Tianxianting
2020-10-20 13:08 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201019114011.GE27114@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tian.xianting@h3c.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®