mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
To: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Martin Radev <martin.b.radev@gmail.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/boot/compressed/64: Check SEV encryption in 64-bit boot-path
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 13:54:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201019175447.GA2720155@rani.riverdale.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201019170008.GA2701355@rani.riverdale.lan>

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 01:00:08PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 05:11:19PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> > 
> > Check whether the hypervisor reported the correct C-bit when running as
> > an SEV guest. Using a wrong C-bit position could be used to leak
> > sensitive data from the guest to the hypervisor.
> > 
> > The check function is in arch/x86/kernel/sev_verify_cbit.S so that it
> > can be re-used in the running kernel image.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> > ---
> 
> > +
> > +	/* Store value to memory and keep it in %r10 */
> > +	movq	%r10, sev_check_data(%rip)
> > +
> 
> Does there need to be a cache flush/invalidation between this and the
> read below to avoid just reading back from cache, or will the hardware
> take care of that?

Also, isn't it possible that the initial page tables we're running on
have already been messed with and have the C-bit in the wrong location,
so that this write happens decrypted?

> 
> > +	/* Backup current %cr3 value to restore it later */
> > +	movq	%cr3, %r11
> > +
> > +	/* Switch to new %cr3 - This might unmap the stack */
> > +	movq	%rdi, %cr3
> 
> Does there need to be a TLB flush after this? When executed from the
> main kernel's head code, CR4.PGE is enabled, and if the original page
> mapping had the global bit set (the decompressor stub sets that in the
> identity mapping), won't the read below still use the original encrypted
> mapping if we don't explicitly flush it?
> 
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Compare value in %r10 with memory location - If C-Bit is incorrect
> > +	 * this would read the encrypted data and make the check fail.
> > +	 */
> > +	cmpq	%r10, sev_check_data(%rip)
> > +
> > +	/* Restore old %cr3 */
> > +	movq	%r11, %cr3
> > +
> > +	/* Check CMPQ result */
> > +	je	3f
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The check failed - Prevent any forward progress to prevent ROP
> > +	 * attacks, invalidate the stack and go into a hlt loop.
> > +	 */
> > +	xorq	%rsp, %rsp
> > +	subq	$0x1000, %rsp
> > +2:	hlt
> > +	jmp 2b
> > +3:
> > +#endif
> > +	ret
> > +SYM_FUNC_END(sev_verify_cbit)
> > +
> > -- 
> > 2.28.0
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-19 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-19 15:11 [PATCH 0/5] x86/sev-es: Mitigate some HV attack vectors Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 15:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/boot/compressed/64: Introduce sev_status Joerg Roedel
2020-10-20  0:59   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-20  1:08     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-20  9:55     ` Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/boot/compressed/64: Add CPUID sanity check to early #VC handler Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 15:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/boot/compressed/64: Check SEV encryption in 64-bit boot-path Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 17:00   ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-19 17:54     ` Arvind Sankar [this message]
2020-10-19 20:39       ` Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 21:31         ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-20  8:59           ` Joerg Roedel
2020-10-20 14:33             ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-20 15:44               ` Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 20:33     ` Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 21:22       ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-20  9:41         ` Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 15:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/head/64: Check SEV encryption before switching to kernel page-table Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 15:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/sev-es: Do not support MMIO to/from encrypted memory Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201019175447.GA2720155@rani.riverdale.lan \
    --to=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.b.radev@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®