From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
To: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Martin Radev <martin.b.radev@gmail.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/boot/compressed/64: Check SEV encryption in 64-bit boot-path
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 13:54:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201019175447.GA2720155@rani.riverdale.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201019170008.GA2701355@rani.riverdale.lan>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 01:00:08PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 05:11:19PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> >
> > Check whether the hypervisor reported the correct C-bit when running as
> > an SEV guest. Using a wrong C-bit position could be used to leak
> > sensitive data from the guest to the hypervisor.
> >
> > The check function is in arch/x86/kernel/sev_verify_cbit.S so that it
> > can be re-used in the running kernel image.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> > ---
>
> > +
> > + /* Store value to memory and keep it in %r10 */
> > + movq %r10, sev_check_data(%rip)
> > +
>
> Does there need to be a cache flush/invalidation between this and the
> read below to avoid just reading back from cache, or will the hardware
> take care of that?
Also, isn't it possible that the initial page tables we're running on
have already been messed with and have the C-bit in the wrong location,
so that this write happens decrypted?
>
> > + /* Backup current %cr3 value to restore it later */
> > + movq %cr3, %r11
> > +
> > + /* Switch to new %cr3 - This might unmap the stack */
> > + movq %rdi, %cr3
>
> Does there need to be a TLB flush after this? When executed from the
> main kernel's head code, CR4.PGE is enabled, and if the original page
> mapping had the global bit set (the decompressor stub sets that in the
> identity mapping), won't the read below still use the original encrypted
> mapping if we don't explicitly flush it?
>
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Compare value in %r10 with memory location - If C-Bit is incorrect
> > + * this would read the encrypted data and make the check fail.
> > + */
> > + cmpq %r10, sev_check_data(%rip)
> > +
> > + /* Restore old %cr3 */
> > + movq %r11, %cr3
> > +
> > + /* Check CMPQ result */
> > + je 3f
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The check failed - Prevent any forward progress to prevent ROP
> > + * attacks, invalidate the stack and go into a hlt loop.
> > + */
> > + xorq %rsp, %rsp
> > + subq $0x1000, %rsp
> > +2: hlt
> > + jmp 2b
> > +3:
> > +#endif
> > + ret
> > +SYM_FUNC_END(sev_verify_cbit)
> > +
> > --
> > 2.28.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-19 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-19 15:11 [PATCH 0/5] x86/sev-es: Mitigate some HV attack vectors Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 15:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/boot/compressed/64: Introduce sev_status Joerg Roedel
2020-10-20 0:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-20 1:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-10-20 9:55 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 15:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/boot/compressed/64: Add CPUID sanity check to early #VC handler Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 15:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/boot/compressed/64: Check SEV encryption in 64-bit boot-path Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 17:00 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-19 17:54 ` Arvind Sankar [this message]
2020-10-19 20:39 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 21:31 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-20 8:59 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-10-20 14:33 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-20 15:44 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 20:33 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 21:22 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-10-20 9:41 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 15:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/head/64: Check SEV encryption before switching to kernel page-table Joerg Roedel
2020-10-19 15:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/sev-es: Do not support MMIO to/from encrypted memory Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201019175447.GA2720155@rani.riverdale.lan \
--to=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.b.radev@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®