From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To: "André Przywara" <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Al Grant <Al.Grant@arm.com>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/20] perf arm-spe: Refactor payload size calculation
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 09:41:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201026014155.GB9541@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b77beca4-91e3-5b76-8cd6-ba31057374a8@arm.com>
Hi Andre,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 06:08:53PM +0100, André Przywara wrote:
> On 22/10/2020 15:57, Leo Yan wrote:
>
> Hi Leo,
>
> > This patch defines macro to extract "sz" field from header, and renames
> > the function payloadlen() to arm_spe_payload_len().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > .../util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > .../util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > index 7c7b5eb09fba..4294c133a465 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> > @@ -69,22 +69,22 @@ const char *arm_spe_pkt_name(enum arm_spe_pkt_type type)
> > return arm_spe_packet_name[type];
> > }
> >
> > -/* return ARM SPE payload size from its encoding,
> > - * which is in bits 5:4 of the byte.
> > - * 00 : byte
> > - * 01 : halfword (2)
> > - * 10 : word (4)
> > - * 11 : doubleword (8)
> > +/*
> > + * Extracts the field "sz" from header bits and converts to bytes:
> > + * 00 : byte (1)
> > + * 01 : halfword (2)
> > + * 10 : word (4)
> > + * 11 : doubleword (8)
> > */
> > -static int payloadlen(unsigned char byte)
> > +static unsigned int arm_spe_payload_len(unsigned char hdr)
> > {
> > - return 1 << ((byte & 0x30) >> 4);
> > + return 1 << SPE_HEADER_SZ(hdr);
>
> I know, I know, I asked for this, but now looking again at it - and
> after having seen the whole series:
> This is now really trivial, and there are just two users? And
> SPE_HEADER_SZ() is only used in here?
>
> So either you just stuff the "1U << .." into the callers of
> arm_spe_payload_len(), or indeed put all of this into one macro (as you
> had originally).
Okay, will stuff the "1U << .." into the function.
> Apologies for this forth and back, but I didn't realise how this is
> really used eventually, and I just saw the transition from function to
> macro.
Actually you considered more than me and I learned many details from the
reivewing process, so no worries :)
> But please use 1U << .., signed shifts are treacherous.
>
> > }
> >
> > static int arm_spe_get_payload(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> > struct arm_spe_pkt *packet)
> > {
> > - size_t payload_len = payloadlen(buf[0]);
> > + size_t payload_len = arm_spe_payload_len(buf[0]);
> >
> > if (len < 1 + payload_len)
> > return ARM_SPE_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> > index 4c870521b8eb..e9ea8e3ead5d 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> >
> > #include <stddef.h>
> > #include <stdint.h>
> > +#include <linux/bits.h>
> >
> > #define ARM_SPE_PKT_DESC_MAX 256
> >
> > @@ -36,6 +37,8 @@ struct arm_spe_pkt {
> > uint64_t payload;
> > };
> >
> > +#define SPE_HEADER_SZ(val) ((val & GENMASK_ULL(5, 4)) >> 4)
>
> If you should keep this, please put parentheses around "val".
I went through your suggestions in this patch and other patches, looks
reasonable to me, will follow them and respin patch set.
Thanks a lot for timely reviewing!
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-26 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-22 14:57 [PATCH v3 00/20] perf arm-spe: Refactor decoding & dumping flow Leo Yan
2020-10-22 14:57 ` [PATCH v3 01/20] perf arm-spe: Include bitops.h for BIT() macro Leo Yan
2020-10-22 14:57 ` [PATCH v3 02/20] perf arm-spe: Fix a typo in comment Leo Yan
2020-10-22 14:57 ` [PATCH v3 03/20] perf arm-spe: Refactor payload size calculation Leo Yan
2020-10-23 17:08 ` André Przywara
2020-10-26 1:41 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 04/20] perf arm-spe: Refactor arm_spe_get_events() Leo Yan
2020-10-23 17:09 ` André Przywara
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 05/20] perf arm-spe: Fix packet length handling Leo Yan
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 06/20] perf arm-spe: Refactor printing string to buffer Leo Yan
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 07/20] perf arm-spe: Refactor packet header parsing Leo Yan
2020-10-23 17:09 ` André Przywara
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 08/20] perf arm-spe: Add new function arm_spe_pkt_desc_addr() Leo Yan
2020-10-23 17:09 ` André Przywara
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 09/20] perf arm-spe: Refactor address packet handling Leo Yan
2020-10-23 17:53 ` André Przywara
2020-10-26 6:30 ` Leo Yan
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 10/20] perf arm-spe: Refactor context " Leo Yan
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 11/20] perf arm-spe: Add new function arm_spe_pkt_desc_counter() Leo Yan
2020-10-23 17:10 ` André Przywara
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 12/20] perf arm-spe: Refactor counter packet handling Leo Yan
2020-10-24 0:31 ` André Przywara
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 13/20] perf arm-spe: Add new function arm_spe_pkt_desc_event() Leo Yan
2020-10-24 0:32 ` André Przywara
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 14/20] perf arm-spe: Refactor event type handling Leo Yan
2020-10-24 0:32 ` André Przywara
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 15/20] perf arm-spe: Remove size condition checking for events Leo Yan
2020-10-23 17:10 ` André Przywara
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 16/20] perf arm-spe: Add new function arm_spe_pkt_desc_op_type() Leo Yan
2020-10-23 17:10 ` André Przywara
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 17/20] perf arm-spe: Refactor operation packet handling Leo Yan
2020-10-26 18:17 ` André Przywara
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 18/20] perf arm-spe: Add more sub classes for operation packet Leo Yan
2020-10-24 0:32 ` André Przywara
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 19/20] perf arm_spe: Decode memory tagging properties Leo Yan
2020-10-24 0:32 ` André Przywara
2020-10-22 14:58 ` [PATCH v3 20/20] perf arm-spe: Add support for ARMv8.3-SPE Leo Yan
2020-10-26 18:17 ` André Przywara
2020-10-27 3:13 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201026014155.GB9541@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s \
--to=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=Al.Grant@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®