* [PATCH] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers
@ 2021-02-03 7:03 Like Xu
2021-02-18 2:31 ` Like Xu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Like Xu @ 2021-02-03 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Kan Liang, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland,
Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-kernel
If the platform supports LBR_INFO register, the x86_pmu.lbr_info will
be assigned in intel_pmu_?_lbr_init_?() and it's safe to expose LBR_INFO
in the x86_perf_get_lbr() directly, instead of relying on lbr_format check.
Also Architectural LBR has IA32_LBR_x_INFO instead of LBR_FORMAT_INFO_x
to hold metadata for the operation, including mispredict, TSX, and
elapsed cycle time information.
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 21890dacfcfe..355ea70f1879 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -1832,12 +1832,10 @@ void __init intel_pmu_arch_lbr_init(void)
*/
int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
{
- int lbr_fmt = x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format;
-
lbr->nr = x86_pmu.lbr_nr;
lbr->from = x86_pmu.lbr_from;
lbr->to = x86_pmu.lbr_to;
- lbr->info = (lbr_fmt == LBR_FORMAT_INFO) ? x86_pmu.lbr_info : 0;
+ lbr->info = x86_pmu.lbr_info;
return 0;
}
--
2.29.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers
2021-02-03 7:03 [PATCH] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers Like Xu
@ 2021-02-18 2:31 ` Like Xu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Like Xu @ 2021-02-18 2:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Kan Liang, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland,
Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-kernel
Hi Peter,
Would you help pick up this patch so that we can enable guest Arch LBR?
---
thx,likexu
On 2021/2/3 15:03, Like Xu wrote:
> If the platform supports LBR_INFO register, the x86_pmu.lbr_info will
> be assigned in intel_pmu_?_lbr_init_?() and it's safe to expose LBR_INFO
> in the x86_perf_get_lbr() directly, instead of relying on lbr_format check.
>
> Also Architectural LBR has IA32_LBR_x_INFO instead of LBR_FORMAT_INFO_x
> to hold metadata for the operation, including mispredict, TSX, and
> elapsed cycle time information.
>
> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> index 21890dacfcfe..355ea70f1879 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
> @@ -1832,12 +1832,10 @@ void __init intel_pmu_arch_lbr_init(void)
> */
> int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
> {
> - int lbr_fmt = x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format;
> -
> lbr->nr = x86_pmu.lbr_nr;
> lbr->from = x86_pmu.lbr_from;
> lbr->to = x86_pmu.lbr_to;
> - lbr->info = (lbr_fmt == LBR_FORMAT_INFO) ? x86_pmu.lbr_info : 0;
> + lbr->info = x86_pmu.lbr_info;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-18 2:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-03 7:03 [PATCH] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers Like Xu
2021-02-18 2:31 ` Like Xu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome