From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] dax-device: Properly handle drivers without remove callback
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 23:28:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210205222842.34896-3-uwe@kleine-koenig.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210205222842.34896-1-uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
If all resources are allocated in .probe() using devm_ functions it
might make sense to not provide a .remove() callback. Then the right
thing is to just return success.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
---
drivers/dax/bus.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dax/bus.c b/drivers/dax/bus.c
index 72fc4b9b9ae6..2c9e3f6f615f 100644
--- a/drivers/dax/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/dax/bus.c
@@ -178,8 +178,12 @@ static int dax_bus_remove(struct device *dev)
{
struct dax_device_driver *dax_drv = to_dax_drv(dev->driver);
struct dev_dax *dev_dax = to_dev_dax(dev);
+ int ret = 0;
- return dax_drv->remove(dev_dax);
+ if (dax_drv->remove)
+ ret = dax_drv->remove(dev_dax);
+
+ return ret;
}
static struct bus_type dax_bus_type = {
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-06 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-05 22:28 [PATCH v2 0/5] dax-device: Some cleanups Uwe Kleine-König
2021-02-05 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dax-device: Prevent registering drivers without probe callback Uwe Kleine-König
2021-02-05 22:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2021-02-05 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] dax-device: Fix error path in dax_driver_register Uwe Kleine-König
2021-02-05 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] dax-device: Drop an empty .remove callback Uwe Kleine-König
2021-02-05 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] dax-device: Make remove callback return void Uwe Kleine-König
2021-02-17 3:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] dax-device: Some cleanups Dan Williams
2021-02-17 3:55 ` Dan Williams
2021-02-17 6:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210205222842.34896-3-uwe@kleine-koenig.org \
--to=uwe@kleine-koenig.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®