mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] dax-device: Properly handle drivers without remove callback
Date: Fri,  5 Feb 2021 23:28:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210205222842.34896-3-uwe@kleine-koenig.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210205222842.34896-1-uwe@kleine-koenig.org>

If all resources are allocated in .probe() using devm_ functions it
might make sense to not provide a .remove() callback. Then the right
thing is to just return success.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
---
 drivers/dax/bus.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dax/bus.c b/drivers/dax/bus.c
index 72fc4b9b9ae6..2c9e3f6f615f 100644
--- a/drivers/dax/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/dax/bus.c
@@ -178,8 +178,12 @@ static int dax_bus_remove(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct dax_device_driver *dax_drv = to_dax_drv(dev->driver);
 	struct dev_dax *dev_dax = to_dev_dax(dev);
+	int ret = 0;
 
-	return dax_drv->remove(dev_dax);
+	if (dax_drv->remove)
+		ret = dax_drv->remove(dev_dax);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static struct bus_type dax_bus_type = {
-- 
2.29.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-06  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-05 22:28 [PATCH v2 0/5] dax-device: Some cleanups Uwe Kleine-König
2021-02-05 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dax-device: Prevent registering drivers without probe callback Uwe Kleine-König
2021-02-05 22:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2021-02-05 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] dax-device: Fix error path in dax_driver_register Uwe Kleine-König
2021-02-05 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] dax-device: Drop an empty .remove callback Uwe Kleine-König
2021-02-05 22:28 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] dax-device: Make remove callback return void Uwe Kleine-König
2021-02-17  3:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] dax-device: Some cleanups Dan Williams
2021-02-17  3:55   ` Dan Williams
2021-02-17  6:39     ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210205222842.34896-3-uwe@kleine-koenig.org \
    --to=uwe@kleine-koenig.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®