From: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@gmail.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+3d2c27c2b7dc2a94814d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: WARNING in iov_iter_revert (2)
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:37:05 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210221083705.3075978-1-snovitoll@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgJuiASyuFSBR9GgN2iPSL7Ep7G_GR1kKsGTL=qhDTDUg@mail.gmail.com>
> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
> @@ -961,6 +961,9 @@ static inline ssize_t do_tty_write(
> ret = write(tty, file, tty->write_buf, size);
> if (ret <= 0)
> break;
> + /* ttyprintk historical oddity */
> + if (ret > size)
> + break;
>
> /* FIXME! Have Al check this! */
> if (ret != size)
>
> in there. Because right now we clearly do strange and not-so-wonderful
> things if the write routine returns a bigger value than it was
> passed.. Not limited to that iov_iter_revert() thing, but the whole
> loop.
>
> Comments?
Just want to comment that this fix is correct (tested),
rather than what I did [1] to return abruptly
in the beginning of do_tty_write() for write(fd, NULL, 0) case.
Let me know if I can prepare a patch with Linus's fix above.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210217155536.2986178-1-snovitoll@gmail.com
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
@@ -905,6 +905,9 @@ static inline ssize_t do_tty_write(
ssize_t ret, written = 0;
unsigned int chunk;
+ if (!count)
+ return -EFAULT;
+
ret = tty_write_lock(tty, file->f_flags & O_NDELAY);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-21 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-16 16:18 syzbot
2021-02-20 14:25 ` syzbot
[not found] ` <CAHk-=wiEBTD884i-U9DU7aDdRxXuz66Q1r-rKTiJUzZoYFgp+g@mail.gmail.com>
2021-02-20 17:38 ` Al Viro
2021-02-20 17:40 ` [git pull] work.namei stuff (v2) Al Viro
2021-02-21 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-02-21 18:39 ` pr-tracker-bot
2021-02-20 19:29 ` WARNING in iov_iter_revert (2) Al Viro
2021-02-20 19:40 ` Al Viro
2021-02-21 0:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-02-21 8:37 ` Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov [this message]
2021-02-21 17:20 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210221083705.3075978-1-snovitoll@gmail.com \
--to=snovitoll@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+3d2c27c2b7dc2a94814d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®