* [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo
@ 2021-03-20 21:16 Bhaskar Chowdhury
2021-03-20 22:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-03-21 19:18 ` Zack Rusin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bhaskar Chowdhury @ 2021-03-20 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-graphics-maintainer, sroland, zackr, airlied, daniel,
dri-devel, linux-kernel
Cc: rdunlap, Bhaskar Chowdhury
s/particuar/particular/
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
* The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
* destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
* otherwise the device will error.
- * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
+ * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
* to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
* the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
* context is referenced in the command stream.
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo
2021-03-20 21:16 [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo Bhaskar Chowdhury
@ 2021-03-20 22:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-03-21 19:18 ` Zack Rusin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2021-03-20 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bhaskar Chowdhury
Cc: linux-graphics-maintainer, sroland, zackr, airlied, daniel,
dri-devel, linux-kernel
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>
> s/particuar/particular/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
> * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
> * otherwise the device will error.
> - * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> + * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
> * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
> * context is referenced in the command stream.
> --
> 2.26.2
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo
2021-03-20 21:16 [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo Bhaskar Chowdhury
2021-03-20 22:40 ` Randy Dunlap
@ 2021-03-21 19:18 ` Zack Rusin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zack Rusin @ 2021-03-21 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bhaskar Chowdhury
Cc: Linux-graphics-maintainer, Roland Scheidegger, David Airlie,
Daniel Vetter, DRI Development, linux-kernel, rdunlap
> On Mar 20, 2021, at 17:16, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> s/particuar/particular/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
> * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
> * otherwise the device will error.
> - * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> + * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
> * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
> * context is referenced in the command stream.
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Looks good. I’ll push it through the drm-misc tree on my next series. Unless of course you want to push it through a different tree in which case:
Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>
z
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-21 19:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-20 21:16 [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo Bhaskar Chowdhury
2021-03-20 22:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-03-21 19:18 ` Zack Rusin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome