From: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Stephan Müller" <smueller@chronox.de>,
"Torsten Duwe" <duwe@suse.de>, "Nicolai Stange" <nstange@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] crypto: api - don't add larvals for !(type & CRYPTO_ALG_TESTED) lookups
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 20:14:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211003181413.12465-5-nstange@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211003181413.12465-1-nstange@suse.de>
As of now, the only valid (and existent) usecase for requesting an
algorithm with !(type & CRYPTO_ALG_TESTED) and (mask & CRYPTO_ALG_TESTED)
via crypto_alg_mod_lookup() is the testmgr invoked upon a
CRYPTO_MSG_ALG_REGISTER notification.
However, in this case it is expected and required that the lookup returns
the actual crypto_alg instance subject to testing.
If OTOH we were to assume for a moment that the crypto_larval_lookup()
called from crypto_alg_mod_lookup() would allocate and return a lookup
larval (which cannot happen, except for perhaps in some corner case like
with concurrent crypto_alg unregistrations), the subsequent wait in
crypto_alg_mod_lookup() would timeout anyway.
Make crypto_larval_wait() skip the lookup larval allocation if the
specified values of mask and type indicate a lookup request for some
crypto_alg instance still not in CRYPTO_ALG_TESTED state and the search for
such one failed. Instead, fail the call with -ENOENT in this case.
This reduces the number of possible ->mask and ->type configurations with
respect to CRYPTO_ALG_TESTED for pending lookup larvals and will enable
further cleanup with subsequent patches.
There is no change in functionality.
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
---
crypto/api.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/crypto/api.c b/crypto/api.c
index 5cced204b6b4..3bee52d7fe4b 100644
--- a/crypto/api.c
+++ b/crypto/api.c
@@ -283,8 +283,22 @@ static struct crypto_alg *crypto_larval_lookup(const char *name, u32 type,
if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(alg) && crypto_is_larval(alg))
alg = crypto_larval_wait(alg);
- else if (!alg)
- alg = crypto_larval_add(name, type, mask);
+ else if (!alg) {
+ /*
+ * Only add a lookup larval if the request is for a
+ * tested algorithm, everything else makes no sense.
+ */
+ bool tested = type & mask & CRYPTO_ALG_TESTED;
+
+ if (!(mask & CRYPTO_ALG_TESTED)) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE((type & CRYPTO_ALG_TESTED));
+ tested = true;
+ }
+ if (tested)
+ alg = crypto_larval_add(name, type, mask);
+ else
+ alg = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+ }
return alg;
}
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-03 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-03 18:14 [PATCH 0/8] crypto: api - priorize tested algorithms in lookup Nicolai Stange
2021-10-03 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/8] crypto: af_alg - reject requests for untested algorithms Nicolai Stange
2021-10-03 18:14 ` [PATCH 2/8] crypto: user " Nicolai Stange
2021-10-03 18:14 ` [PATCH 3/8] crypto: api - only support lookups for specific CRYPTO_ALG_TESTED status Nicolai Stange
2021-10-03 18:14 ` Nicolai Stange [this message]
2021-10-03 18:14 ` [PATCH 5/8] crypto: api - always set CRYPTO_ALG_TESTED in lookup larvals' ->mask/type Nicolai Stange
2021-10-03 18:14 ` [PATCH 6/8] crypto: api - make crypto_alg_lookup() consistently check for failed algos Nicolai Stange
2021-10-03 18:14 ` [PATCH 7/8] crypto: api - lift common mask + type adjustment to crypto_larval_lookup() Nicolai Stange
2021-10-03 18:14 ` [PATCH 8/8] crypto: api - make the algorithm lookup priorize non-larvals Nicolai Stange
2021-10-08 11:54 ` Herbert Xu
2021-10-11 8:34 ` Nicolai Stange
2021-10-22 11:51 ` Herbert Xu
2021-10-27 9:59 ` Nicolai Stange
2021-10-28 2:42 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211003181413.12465-5-nstange@suse.de \
--to=nstange@suse.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=duwe@suse.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smueller@chronox.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®