mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hou Wenlong <houwenlong93@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 14/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Add helpers to read/write TDP MMU SPTEs and document RCU
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 04:50:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211120045046.3940942-15-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211120045046.3940942-1-seanjc@google.com>

Add helpers to read and write TDP MMU SPTEs instead of open coding
rcu_dereference() all over the place, and to provide a convenient
location to document why KVM doesn't exempt holding mmu_lock for write
from having to hold RCU (and any future changes to the rules).

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c |  6 +++---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c  | 14 +++++++-------
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c
index b3ed302c1a35..1f7741c725f6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ static void tdp_iter_refresh_sptep(struct tdp_iter *iter)
 {
 	iter->sptep = iter->pt_path[iter->level - 1] +
 		SHADOW_PT_INDEX(iter->gfn << PAGE_SHIFT, iter->level);
-	iter->old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter->sptep));
+	iter->old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(iter->sptep);
 }
 
 static gfn_t round_gfn_for_level(gfn_t gfn, int level)
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static bool try_step_down(struct tdp_iter *iter)
 	 * Reread the SPTE before stepping down to avoid traversing into page
 	 * tables that are no longer linked from this entry.
 	 */
-	iter->old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter->sptep));
+	iter->old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(iter->sptep);
 
 	child_pt = spte_to_child_pt(iter->old_spte, iter->level);
 	if (!child_pt)
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static bool try_step_side(struct tdp_iter *iter)
 	iter->gfn += KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(iter->level);
 	iter->next_last_level_gfn = iter->gfn;
 	iter->sptep++;
-	iter->old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter->sptep));
+	iter->old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(iter->sptep);
 
 	return true;
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
index b1748b988d3a..9c04d8677cb3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
@@ -9,6 +9,22 @@
 
 typedef u64 __rcu *tdp_ptep_t;
 
+/*
+ * TDP MMU SPTEs are RCU protected to allow paging structures (non-leaf SPTEs)
+ * to be zapped while holding mmu_lock for read.  Holding RCU isn't required for
+ * correctness if mmu_lock is held for write, but plumbing "struct kvm" down to
+ * the lower* depths of the TDP MMU just to make lockdep happy is a nightmare,
+ * so all* accesses to SPTEs are must be done under RCU protection.
+ */
+static inline u64 kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(tdp_ptep_t sptep)
+{
+	return READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(sptep));
+}
+static inline void kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 val)
+{
+	WRITE_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(sptep), val);
+}
+
 /*
  * A TDP iterator performs a pre-order walk over a TDP paging structure.
  */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 3ff7b4cd7d0e..ca6b30a7130d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static inline bool tdp_mmu_zap_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
 	 * here since the SPTE is going from non-present
 	 * to non-present.
 	 */
-	WRITE_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter->sptep), 0);
+	kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(iter->sptep, 0);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static inline void __tdp_mmu_set_spte(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
 	 */
 	WARN_ON(is_removed_spte(iter->old_spte));
 
-	WRITE_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter->sptep), new_spte);
+	kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(iter->sptep, new_spte);
 
 	__handle_changed_spte(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->gfn, iter->old_spte,
 			      new_spte, iter->level, false);
@@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 			 * The iter must explicitly re-read the SPTE because
 			 * the atomic cmpxchg failed.
 			 */
-			iter.old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter.sptep));
+			iter.old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(iter.sptep);
 			goto retry;
 		}
 	}
@@ -1012,7 +1012,7 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
 			 * because the new value informs the !present
 			 * path below.
 			 */
-			iter.old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter.sptep));
+			iter.old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(iter.sptep);
 		}
 
 		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte)) {
@@ -1225,7 +1225,7 @@ static bool wrprot_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 			 * The iter must explicitly re-read the SPTE because
 			 * the atomic cmpxchg failed.
 			 */
-			iter.old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter.sptep));
+			iter.old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(iter.sptep);
 			goto retry;
 		}
 		spte_set = true;
@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ static bool clear_dirty_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 			 * The iter must explicitly re-read the SPTE because
 			 * the atomic cmpxchg failed.
 			 */
-			iter.old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter.sptep));
+			iter.old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(iter.sptep);
 			goto retry;
 		}
 		spte_set = true;
@@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ static void zap_collapsible_spte_range(struct kvm *kvm,
 			 * The iter must explicitly re-read the SPTE because
 			 * the atomic cmpxchg failed.
 			 */
-			iter.old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter.sptep));
+			iter.old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(iter.sptep);
 			goto retry;
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.34.0.rc2.393.gf8c9666880-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-20  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-20  4:50 [PATCH 00/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Overhaul TDP MMU zapping and flushing Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 01/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Use yield-safe TDP MMU root iter in MMU notifier unmapping Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 19:48   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-30  8:03   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 02/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip tlb flush if it has been done in zap_gfn_range() Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 03/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove spurious TLB flushes in TDP MMU zap collapsible path Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 04/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Retry page fault if root is invalidated by memslot update Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 19:54   ` Ben Gardon
2021-12-01 20:49   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-08 19:17   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 05/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for present SPTE when clearing dirty bit in TDP MMU Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 19:57   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 06/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Formalize TDP MMU's (unintended?) deferred TLB flush logic Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 07/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Document that zapping invalidated roots doesn't need to flush Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 08/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop unused @kvm param from kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root() Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 20:02   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 09/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write in unyielding root iter Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 20:10   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-22 20:19     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 10/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow yielding when zapping GFNs for defunct TDP MMU root Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 21:30   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-22 22:40     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 23:03       ` Ben Gardon
2021-12-14 23:45     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-14 23:52       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 11/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for !leaf=>leaf, not PFN change, in TDP MMU SP removal Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 12/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Batch TLB flushes from TDP MMU for MMU notifier change_spte Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 21:45   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 13/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop RCU after processing each root in MMU notifier hooks Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 21:47   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-11-22 21:55   ` [PATCH 14/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Add helpers to read/write TDP MMU SPTEs and document RCU Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 15/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Take TDP MMU roots off list when invalidating all roots Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 22:20   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-22 23:08     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-23  0:03       ` Ben Gardon
2021-12-14 23:34         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 16/28] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN if old _or_ new SPTE is REMOVED in non-atomic path Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 21:57   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 17/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Terminate yield-friendly walk if invalid root observed Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 22:25   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 18/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor low-level TDP MMU set SPTE helper to take raw vals Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 22:29   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 19/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only the target TDP MMU shadow page in NX recovery Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 22:43   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-23  1:16     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-23 19:35       ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 20/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Use common TDP MMU zap helper for MMU notifier unmap hook Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 22:49   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 21/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Add TDP MMU helper to zap a root Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 22:54   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-22 23:15     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 23:38       ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 22/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip remote TLB flush when zapping all of TDP MMU Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 23:00   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 23/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Use "zap root" path for "slow" zap of all TDP MMU SPTEs Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 24/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Add dedicated helper to zap TDP MMU root shadow page Sean Christopherson
2021-11-23  1:04   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 25/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write to zap TDP MMU range Sean Christopherson
2021-11-23 19:58   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 26/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only TDP MMU leafs in kvm_zap_gfn_range() Sean Christopherson
2021-11-23 19:58   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 27/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Do remote TLB flush before dropping RCU in TDP MMU resched Sean Christopherson
2021-11-23 19:58   ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-24 18:42     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-30 11:29   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-30 15:45     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-30 16:16       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-20  4:50 ` [PATCH 28/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Defer TLB flush to caller when freeing TDP MMU shadow pages Sean Christopherson
2021-11-23 20:12   ` Ben Gardon
2021-12-01 17:53 ` [PATCH 00/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Overhaul TDP MMU zapping and flushing David Matlack
2021-12-02  2:03   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-03  0:16     ` David Matlack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211120045046.3940942-15-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=houwenlong93@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®