From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hou Wenlong <houwenlong93@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 24/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Add dedicated helper to zap TDP MMU root shadow page
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 04:50:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211120045046.3940942-25-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211120045046.3940942-1-seanjc@google.com>
Convert tdp_mmu_zap_root() into its own dedicated flow instead of simply
redirecting into zap_gfn_range(). In addition to hardening zapping of
roots, this will allow future simplification of zap_gfn_range() by having
it zap only leaf SPTEs, and by removing its tricky "zap all" heuristic.
By having all paths that truly need to free _all_ SPs flow through the
dedicated root zapper, the generic zapper can be freed of those concerns.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 99ea19e763da..0e5a0d40e54a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -53,10 +53,6 @@ void kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
rcu_barrier();
}
-static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
- gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool can_yield, bool flush,
- bool shared);
-
static void tdp_mmu_free_sp(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
free_page((unsigned long)sp->spt);
@@ -79,11 +75,8 @@ static void tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
tdp_mmu_free_sp(sp);
}
-static bool tdp_mmu_zap_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
- bool shared)
-{
- return zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, 0, -1ull, true, false, shared);
-}
+static void tdp_mmu_zap_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
+ bool shared, bool root_is_unreachable);
/*
* Note, putting a root might sleep, i.e. the caller must have IRQs enabled and
@@ -120,13 +113,8 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
* invalidates any paging-structure-cache entries, i.e. TLB entries for
* intermediate paging structures, that may be zapped, as such entries
* are associated with the ASID on both VMX and SVM.
- *
- * WARN if a flush is reported for an invalid root, as its child SPTEs
- * should have been zapped by kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots(), and
- * inserting new SPTEs under an invalid root is a KVM bug.
*/
- if (tdp_mmu_zap_root(kvm, root, shared))
- WARN_ON_ONCE(root->role.invalid);
+ tdp_mmu_zap_root(kvm, root, shared, true);
call_rcu(&root->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);
}
@@ -766,6 +754,65 @@ static inline bool tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(struct kvm *kvm,
return false;
}
+static inline gfn_t tdp_mmu_max_gfn_host(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * Bound TDP MMU walks at host.MAXPHYADDR, guest accesses beyond that
+ * will hit a #PF(RSVD) and never hit an EPT Violation/Misconfig / #NPF,
+ * and so KVM will never install a SPTE for such addresses.
+ */
+ return 1ULL << (shadow_phys_bits - PAGE_SHIFT);
+}
+
+static void tdp_mmu_zap_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
+ bool shared, bool root_is_unreachable)
+{
+ struct tdp_iter iter;
+
+ gfn_t end = tdp_mmu_max_gfn_host();
+ gfn_t start = 0;
+
+ kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(kvm, shared);
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ /*
+ * No need to try to step down in the iterator when zapping an entire
+ * root, zapping an upper-level SPTE will recurse on its children.
+ */
+ for_each_tdp_pte_min_level(iter, root->spt, root->role.level,
+ root->role.level, start, end) {
+retry:
+ if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false, shared))
+ continue;
+
+ if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte))
+ continue;
+
+ if (!shared) {
+ tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
+ } else if (!tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(kvm, &iter, 0)) {
+ /*
+ * cmpxchg() shouldn't fail if the root is unreachable.
+ * to be unreachable. Re-read the SPTE and retry so as
+ * not to leak the page and its children.
+ */
+ WARN_ONCE(root_is_unreachable,
+ "Contended TDP MMU SPTE in unreachable root.");
+ iter.old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_read_spte(iter.sptep);
+ goto retry;
+ }
+ /*
+ * WARN if the root is invalid and is unreachable, all SPTEs
+ * should've been zapped by kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots(),
+ * and inserting new SPTEs under an invalid root is a KVM bug.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(root_is_unreachable && root->role.invalid);
+ }
+
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
u64 old_spte;
@@ -807,8 +854,7 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
gfn_t start, gfn_t end, bool can_yield, bool flush,
bool shared)
{
- gfn_t max_gfn_host = 1ULL << (shadow_phys_bits - PAGE_SHIFT);
- bool zap_all = (start == 0 && end >= max_gfn_host);
+ bool zap_all = (start == 0 && end >= tdp_mmu_max_gfn_host());
struct tdp_iter iter;
/*
@@ -817,12 +863,7 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
*/
int min_level = zap_all ? root->role.level : PG_LEVEL_4K;
- /*
- * Bound the walk at host.MAXPHYADDR, guest accesses beyond that will
- * hit a #PF(RSVD) and never get to an EPT Violation/Misconfig / #NPF,
- * and so KVM will never install a SPTE for such addresses.
- */
- end = min(end, max_gfn_host);
+ end = min(end, tdp_mmu_max_gfn_host());
kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(kvm, shared);
@@ -898,7 +939,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all(struct kvm *kvm)
*/
for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++) {
for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, i, false)
- (void)tdp_mmu_zap_root(kvm, root, false);
+ tdp_mmu_zap_root(kvm, root, false, true);
}
}
@@ -934,7 +975,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_invalidated_roots(struct kvm *kvm,
* will still flush on yield, but that's a minor performance
* blip and not a functional issue.
*/
- (void)tdp_mmu_zap_root(kvm, root, true);
+ tdp_mmu_zap_root(kvm, root, true, false);
kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(kvm, root, true);
}
}
--
2.34.0.rc2.393.gf8c9666880-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-20 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-20 4:50 [PATCH 00/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Overhaul TDP MMU zapping and flushing Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 01/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Use yield-safe TDP MMU root iter in MMU notifier unmapping Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 19:48 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-30 8:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 02/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip tlb flush if it has been done in zap_gfn_range() Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 03/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Remove spurious TLB flushes in TDP MMU zap collapsible path Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 04/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Retry page fault if root is invalidated by memslot update Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 19:54 ` Ben Gardon
2021-12-01 20:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-08 19:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 05/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for present SPTE when clearing dirty bit in TDP MMU Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 19:57 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 06/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Formalize TDP MMU's (unintended?) deferred TLB flush logic Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 07/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Document that zapping invalidated roots doesn't need to flush Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 08/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop unused @kvm param from kvm_tdp_mmu_get_root() Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 20:02 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 09/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write in unyielding root iter Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 20:10 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-22 20:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 10/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow yielding when zapping GFNs for defunct TDP MMU root Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 21:30 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-22 22:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 23:03 ` Ben Gardon
2021-12-14 23:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-14 23:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 11/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Check for !leaf=>leaf, not PFN change, in TDP MMU SP removal Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 12/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Batch TLB flushes from TDP MMU for MMU notifier change_spte Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 21:45 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 13/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Drop RCU after processing each root in MMU notifier hooks Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 21:47 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 14/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Add helpers to read/write TDP MMU SPTEs and document RCU Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 21:55 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 15/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Take TDP MMU roots off list when invalidating all roots Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 22:20 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-22 23:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-23 0:03 ` Ben Gardon
2021-12-14 23:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 16/28] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN if old _or_ new SPTE is REMOVED in non-atomic path Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 21:57 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 17/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Terminate yield-friendly walk if invalid root observed Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 22:25 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 18/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor low-level TDP MMU set SPTE helper to take raw vals Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 22:29 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 19/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only the target TDP MMU shadow page in NX recovery Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 22:43 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-23 1:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-23 19:35 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 20/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Use common TDP MMU zap helper for MMU notifier unmap hook Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 22:49 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 21/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Add TDP MMU helper to zap a root Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 22:54 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-22 23:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 23:38 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 22/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip remote TLB flush when zapping all of TDP MMU Sean Christopherson
2021-11-22 23:00 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 23/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Use "zap root" path for "slow" zap of all TDP MMU SPTEs Sean Christopherson
2021-11-20 4:50 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-11-23 1:04 ` [PATCH 24/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Add dedicated helper to zap TDP MMU root shadow page Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 25/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Require mmu_lock be held for write to zap TDP MMU range Sean Christopherson
2021-11-23 19:58 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 26/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only TDP MMU leafs in kvm_zap_gfn_range() Sean Christopherson
2021-11-23 19:58 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 27/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Do remote TLB flush before dropping RCU in TDP MMU resched Sean Christopherson
2021-11-23 19:58 ` Ben Gardon
2021-11-24 18:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-30 11:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-30 15:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-11-30 16:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-11-20 4:50 ` [PATCH 28/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Defer TLB flush to caller when freeing TDP MMU shadow pages Sean Christopherson
2021-11-23 20:12 ` Ben Gardon
2021-12-01 17:53 ` [PATCH 00/28] KVM: x86/mmu: Overhaul TDP MMU zapping and flushing David Matlack
2021-12-02 2:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-03 0:16 ` David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211120045046.3940942-25-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=houwenlong93@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®