mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/csum: fix initial seed for odd buffers
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 06:18:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211125141817.3541501-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com> (raw)

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

When I folded do_csum() into csum_partial(), I missed that we
had to swap odd/even bytes from @sum argument.

This is because this swap will happen again at the end of the function.

[A, B, C, D] -> [B, A, D, C]

As far as Internet checksums (rfc 1071) are concerned, we can instead
rotate the whole 32bit value by 8 (or 24)

-> [D, A, B, C]

Note that I played with the idea of replacing this final swaping:

    result = from32to16(result);
    result = ((result >> 8) & 0xff) | ((result & 0xff) << 8);

With:

    result = ror32(result, 8);

But while the generated code was definitely better for the odd case,
run time cost for the more likely even case was not better for gcc.

gcc is replacing a well predicted conditional branch
with a cmov instruction after a ror instruction which adds
a cost canceling the cmov gain.

Many thanks to Noah Goldstein for reporting this issue.

Fixes: df4554cebdaa ("x86/csum: Rewrite/optimize csum_partial()")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
---
 arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
index 1eb8f2d11f7c785be624eba315fe9ca7989fd56d..40b527ba1da1f74b5dbc51ddd97a9ecad22ee5ae 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ __wsum csum_partial(const void *buff, int len, __wsum sum)
 	if (unlikely(odd)) {
 		if (unlikely(len == 0))
 			return sum;
+		temp64 = ror32((__force u32)sum, 8);
 		temp64 += (*(unsigned char *)buff << 8);
 		len--;
 		buff++;
-- 
2.34.0.rc2.393.gf8c9666880-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2021-11-25 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-25 14:18 Eric Dumazet [this message]
2021-11-30 22:16 ` Dave Hansen
2021-12-01  0:18   ` Eric Dumazet
2021-12-01  0:33 ` [tip: x86/core] x86/csum: Fix " tip-bot2 for Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211125141817.3541501-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=goldstein.w.n@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®