mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: elver@google.com, andreyknvl@google.com, glider@google.com,
	dvyukov@google.com, cai@lca.pw, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH kcsan 12/29] kcsan: Ignore GCC 11+ warnings about TSan runtime support
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:04:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211214220439.2236564-12-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211214220356.GA2236323@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>

From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>

GCC 11 has introduced a new warning option, -Wtsan [1], to warn about
unsupported operations in the TSan runtime. But KCSAN != TSan runtime,
so none of the warnings apply.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.1.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html

Ignore the warnings.

Currently the warning only fires in the test for __atomic_thread_fence():

kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c: In function ‘test_atomic_builtins’:
kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c:1234:17: warning: ‘atomic_thread_fence’ is not supported with ‘-fsanitize=thread’ [-Wtsan]
 1234 |                 __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

which exists to ensure the KCSAN runtime keeps supporting the builtin
instrumentation.

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 scripts/Makefile.kcsan | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.kcsan b/scripts/Makefile.kcsan
index 4c7f0d282e42f..19f693b68a968 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile.kcsan
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.kcsan
@@ -13,6 +13,12 @@ kcsan-cflags := -fsanitize=thread -fno-optimize-sibling-calls \
 	$(call cc-option,$(call cc-param,tsan-compound-read-before-write=1),$(call cc-option,$(call cc-param,tsan-instrument-read-before-write=1))) \
 	$(call cc-param,tsan-distinguish-volatile=1)
 
+ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC
+# GCC started warning about operations unsupported by the TSan runtime. But
+# KCSAN != TSan, so just ignore these warnings.
+kcsan-cflags += -Wno-tsan
+endif
+
 ifndef CONFIG_KCSAN_WEAK_MEMORY
 kcsan-cflags += $(call cc-option,$(call cc-param,tsan-instrument-func-entry-exit=0))
 endif
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-14 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-14 22:03 [PATCH kcsan 0/29] Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer (KCSAN) updates for v5.17 Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 01/29] kcsan: Refactor reading of instrumented memory Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 02/29] kcsan: Remove redundant zero-initialization of globals Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 03/29] kcsan: Avoid checking scoped accesses from nested contexts Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 04/29] kcsan: Add core support for a subset of weak memory modeling Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 05/29] kcsan: Add core memory barrier instrumentation functions Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 06/29] kcsan, kbuild: Add option for barrier instrumentation only Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 07/29] kcsan: Call scoped accesses reordered in reports Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 08/29] kcsan: Show location access was reordered to Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 09/29] kcsan: Document modeling of weak memory Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 10/29] kcsan: test: Match reordered or normal accesses Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 11/29] kcsan: test: Add test cases for memory barrier instrumentation Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 13/29] kcsan: selftest: Add test case to check " Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 14/29] locking/barriers, kcsan: Add instrumentation for barriers Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 15/29] locking/barriers, kcsan: Support generic instrumentation Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 16/29] locking/atomics, kcsan: Add instrumentation for barriers Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 17/29] asm-generic/bitops, " Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 18/29] x86/barriers, kcsan: Use generic instrumentation for non-smp barriers Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 19/29] x86/qspinlock, kcsan: Instrument barrier of pv_queued_spin_unlock() Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 20/29] mm, kcsan: Enable barrier instrumentation Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 21/29] sched, kcsan: Enable memory " Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 22/29] objtool, kcsan: Add memory barrier instrumentation to whitelist Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 23/29] objtool, kcsan: Remove memory barrier instrumentation from noinstr Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 24/29] compiler_attributes.h: Add __disable_sanitizer_instrumentation Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 25/29] kcsan: Support WEAK_MEMORY with Clang where no objtool support exists Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 26/29] kcsan: Make barrier tests compatible with lockdep Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 27/29] kcsan: Turn barrier instrumentation into macros Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 28/29] kcsan: Avoid nested contexts reading inconsistent reorder_access Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 29/29] kcsan: Only test clear_bit_unlock_is_negative_byte if arch defines it Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211214220439.2236564-12-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®