mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: elver@google.com, andreyknvl@google.com, glider@google.com,
	dvyukov@google.com, cai@lca.pw, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH kcsan 03/29] kcsan: Avoid checking scoped accesses from nested contexts
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:04:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211214220439.2236564-3-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211214220356.GA2236323@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>

From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>

Avoid checking scoped accesses from nested contexts (such as nested
interrupts or in scheduler code) which share the same kcsan_ctx.

This is to avoid detecting false positive races of accesses in the same
thread with currently scoped accesses: consider setting up a watchpoint
for a non-scoped (normal) access that also "conflicts" with a current
scoped access. In a nested interrupt (or in the scheduler), which shares
the same kcsan_ctx, we cannot check scoped accesses set up in the parent
context -- simply ignore them in this case.

With the introduction of kcsan_ctx::disable_scoped, we can also clean up
kcsan_check_scoped_accesses()'s recursion guard, and do not need to
modify the list's prev pointer.

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/kcsan.h |  1 +
 kernel/kcsan/core.c   | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/kcsan.h b/include/linux/kcsan.h
index fc266ecb2a4db..13cef3458fedf 100644
--- a/include/linux/kcsan.h
+++ b/include/linux/kcsan.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
  */
 struct kcsan_ctx {
 	int disable_count; /* disable counter */
+	int disable_scoped; /* disable scoped access counter */
 	int atomic_next; /* number of following atomic ops */
 
 	/*
diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/core.c b/kernel/kcsan/core.c
index e34a1710b7bcc..bd359f8ee63a7 100644
--- a/kernel/kcsan/core.c
+++ b/kernel/kcsan/core.c
@@ -204,15 +204,17 @@ check_access(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int type, unsigned long ip);
 static noinline void kcsan_check_scoped_accesses(void)
 {
 	struct kcsan_ctx *ctx = get_ctx();
-	struct list_head *prev_save = ctx->scoped_accesses.prev;
 	struct kcsan_scoped_access *scoped_access;
 
-	ctx->scoped_accesses.prev = NULL;  /* Avoid recursion. */
+	if (ctx->disable_scoped)
+		return;
+
+	ctx->disable_scoped++;
 	list_for_each_entry(scoped_access, &ctx->scoped_accesses, list) {
 		check_access(scoped_access->ptr, scoped_access->size,
 			     scoped_access->type, scoped_access->ip);
 	}
-	ctx->scoped_accesses.prev = prev_save;
+	ctx->disable_scoped--;
 }
 
 /* Rules for generic atomic accesses. Called from fast-path. */
@@ -465,6 +467,15 @@ kcsan_setup_watchpoint(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int type, unsigned
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Avoid races of scoped accesses from nested interrupts (or scheduler).
+	 * Assume setting up a watchpoint for a non-scoped (normal) access that
+	 * also conflicts with a current scoped access. In a nested interrupt,
+	 * which shares the context, it would check a conflicting scoped access.
+	 * To avoid, disable scoped access checking.
+	 */
+	ctx->disable_scoped++;
+
 	/*
 	 * Save and restore the IRQ state trace touched by KCSAN, since KCSAN's
 	 * runtime is entered for every memory access, and potentially useful
@@ -578,6 +589,7 @@ kcsan_setup_watchpoint(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int type, unsigned
 	if (!kcsan_interrupt_watcher)
 		local_irq_restore(irq_flags);
 	kcsan_restore_irqtrace(current);
+	ctx->disable_scoped--;
 out:
 	user_access_restore(ua_flags);
 }
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-14 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-14 22:03 [PATCH kcsan 0/29] Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer (KCSAN) updates for v5.17 Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 01/29] kcsan: Refactor reading of instrumented memory Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 02/29] kcsan: Remove redundant zero-initialization of globals Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 04/29] kcsan: Add core support for a subset of weak memory modeling Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 05/29] kcsan: Add core memory barrier instrumentation functions Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 06/29] kcsan, kbuild: Add option for barrier instrumentation only Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 07/29] kcsan: Call scoped accesses reordered in reports Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 08/29] kcsan: Show location access was reordered to Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 09/29] kcsan: Document modeling of weak memory Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 10/29] kcsan: test: Match reordered or normal accesses Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 11/29] kcsan: test: Add test cases for memory barrier instrumentation Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 12/29] kcsan: Ignore GCC 11+ warnings about TSan runtime support Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 13/29] kcsan: selftest: Add test case to check memory barrier instrumentation Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 14/29] locking/barriers, kcsan: Add instrumentation for barriers Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 15/29] locking/barriers, kcsan: Support generic instrumentation Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 16/29] locking/atomics, kcsan: Add instrumentation for barriers Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 17/29] asm-generic/bitops, " Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 18/29] x86/barriers, kcsan: Use generic instrumentation for non-smp barriers Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 19/29] x86/qspinlock, kcsan: Instrument barrier of pv_queued_spin_unlock() Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 20/29] mm, kcsan: Enable barrier instrumentation Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 21/29] sched, kcsan: Enable memory " Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 22/29] objtool, kcsan: Add memory barrier instrumentation to whitelist Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 23/29] objtool, kcsan: Remove memory barrier instrumentation from noinstr Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 24/29] compiler_attributes.h: Add __disable_sanitizer_instrumentation Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 25/29] kcsan: Support WEAK_MEMORY with Clang where no objtool support exists Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 26/29] kcsan: Make barrier tests compatible with lockdep Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 27/29] kcsan: Turn barrier instrumentation into macros Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 28/29] kcsan: Avoid nested contexts reading inconsistent reorder_access Paul E. McKenney
2021-12-14 22:04 ` [PATCH kcsan 29/29] kcsan: Only test clear_bit_unlock_is_negative_byte if arch defines it Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211214220439.2236564-3-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®