* [PATCH] selinux: initialize proto variable in selinux_ip_postroute_compat()
@ 2021-12-24 15:07 trix
2021-12-27 15:48 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: trix @ 2021-12-24 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paul, stephen.smalley.work, eparis, nathan, ndesaulniers
Cc: selinux, linux-kernel, llvm, Tom Rix
From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Clang static analysis reports this warning
hooks.c:5765:6: warning: 4th function call argument is an uninitialized value
if (selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(sksec->sid, skb, &ad, proto))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
selinux_parse_skb() can return ok without setting proto. The later call
to selinux_xfrm_postroute_last() does an early check of proto and can
return ok is the garbage proto value matches. So initialize proto.
Fixes: eef9b41622f2 ("selinux: cleanup selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb() and selinux_xfrm_postroute_last()")
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
---
security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index e2a6d0f5c47af..fd7a0e9e26647 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -5742,7 +5742,7 @@ static unsigned int selinux_ip_postroute_compat(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct sk_security_struct *sksec;
struct common_audit_data ad;
struct lsm_network_audit net = {0,};
- u8 proto;
+ u8 proto = 0;
sk = skb_to_full_sk(skb);
if (sk == NULL)
--
2.26.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] selinux: initialize proto variable in selinux_ip_postroute_compat()
2021-12-24 15:07 [PATCH] selinux: initialize proto variable in selinux_ip_postroute_compat() trix
@ 2021-12-27 15:48 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2021-12-27 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: trix
Cc: stephen.smalley.work, eparis, nathan, ndesaulniers, selinux,
linux-kernel, llvm
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 10:07 AM <trix@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
>
> Clang static analysis reports this warning
>
> hooks.c:5765:6: warning: 4th function call argument is an uninitialized value
> if (selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(sksec->sid, skb, &ad, proto))
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> selinux_parse_skb() can return ok without setting proto. The later call
> to selinux_xfrm_postroute_last() does an early check of proto and can
> return ok is the garbage proto value matches. So initialize proto.
>
> Fixes: eef9b41622f2 ("selinux: cleanup selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb() and selinux_xfrm_postroute_last()")
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> ---
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks Tom. I don't think this is something that could be easily
triggered on a normal system, even if the compatibility mode was
enabled, but this is something that we should fix regardless. I've
merged this into selinux/stable-5.16 and will send this up to Linus as
soon as it clears the normal automated testing.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-27 15:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-24 15:07 [PATCH] selinux: initialize proto variable in selinux_ip_postroute_compat() trix
2021-12-27 15:48 ` Paul Moore
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®