[PATCH] sound/soc/codecs: remove redundant ret variable

[PATCH] sound/soc/codecs: remove redundant ret variable

[cgel.zte]

From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

Return value from devm_snd_soc_register_component() directly instead
of taking this in another redundant variable.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: CGEL ZTE <cgel.zte@gmail.com>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/wm8971.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8971.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8971.c
index 21ae55c32a6d..ddf0e2f5e66a 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8971.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8971.c
@@ -676,7 +676,6 @@ static int wm8971_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 			    const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 {
 	struct wm8971_priv *wm8971;
-	int ret;
 
 	wm8971 = devm_kzalloc(&i2c->dev, sizeof(struct wm8971_priv),
 			      GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -689,10 +688,8 @@ static int wm8971_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
 
 	i2c_set_clientdata(i2c, wm8971);
 
-	ret = devm_snd_soc_register_component(&i2c->dev,
+	return devm_snd_soc_register_component(&i2c->dev,
 			&soc_component_dev_wm8971, &wm8971_dai, 1);
-
-	return ret;
 }
 
 static const struct i2c_device_id wm8971_i2c_id[] = {
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH] sound/soc/codecs: remove redundant ret variable

[Charles Keepax]

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 01:28:33AM +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Return value from devm_snd_soc_register_component() directly instead
> of taking this in another redundant variable.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: CGEL ZTE <cgel.zte@gmail.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>

Thanks,
Charles

Re: [PATCH] sound/soc/codecs: remove redundant ret variable

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1008 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 01:28:33AM +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Return value from devm_snd_soc_register_component() directly instead
> of taking this in another redundant variable.

Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and
make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing.
There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone.

Please don't ignore review comments, people are generally making them
for a reason and are likely to have the same concerns if issues remain
unaddressed.  Having to repeat the same comments can get repetitive and
make people question the value of time spent reviewing.  If you disagree
with the review comments that's fine but you need to reply and discuss
your concerns so that the reviewer can understand your decisions.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] sound/soc/codecs: remove redundant ret variable

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 01:28:33 +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Return value from devm_snd_soc_register_component() directly instead
> of taking this in another redundant variable.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] sound/soc/codecs: remove redundant ret variable
      commit: 4ec19deec7ffae843c3445ac7d2cfcc78c56c145

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark