From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing: Add test for user space strings when filtering on string pointers
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:21:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220110192104.5daaabe7@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c2789f990394df5b7907287fc0e1232@AcuMS.aculab.com>
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 22:03:20 +0000
David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> wrote:
> > Only root has access to the information read here. All tracing requires
> > root or those explicitly given access to the tracing data, which pretty
> > much allows all access to kernel internals (including all memory). So
> > nothing to worry about here ;-)
>
> Is this filtering trace using a filename passed to a system call by a user program?
> In which case a user program can set up a system call that normally fails
> (because the copy_from_user() errors) but if root tries to run a system
> call event trace on that process can read arbitrary addresses and
> thus crash the system?
>
> While unlikely root might be persuaded to try to run the trace.
Yes. That's exactly what the code does today, and why it's a bug.
This patch instead uses copy_from_user_nofault/copy_from_kernel_nofault and
copies it into a temp buffer and then compares against that.
If a user passes in a crazy pointer, the copy_from_user/kernel_nofault()
will not read it, and the filter simply fails to match. Nothing bad will
happen.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-11 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-10 16:55 Steven Rostedt
2022-01-10 17:11 ` David Laight
2022-01-10 17:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-10 17:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-10 21:58 ` David Laight
2022-01-11 20:55 ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-13 17:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-13 21:28 ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-13 21:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-14 2:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-14 7:29 ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-14 9:35 ` David Laight
2022-01-13 22:11 ` David Laight
2022-01-13 22:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-10 22:03 ` David Laight
2022-01-11 0:21 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2022-01-12 4:13 ` Pingfan Liu
2022-01-13 18:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-13 22:02 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220110192104.5daaabe7@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=zanussi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®