mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>,
	hca@linux.ibm.com, deller@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing: Add test for user space strings when filtering on  string pointers
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:28:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yt9dwnj3wcke.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220113125754.0cb5273f@gandalf.local.home> (Steven Rostedt's message of "Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:57:54 -0500")

Hi Steve,

Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> writes:

> On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 21:55:53 +0100
> Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> > Isn't there also at least one architecture where you can't differentiate
>> > between user and kernel pointers by looking at the address?
>> > (Something like sparc ASI is used for user accesses so both user
>> > and kernel get the full 4G address range. But it isn't sparc (or pdp/11))
>> > ISTR it causing issues with the code for kernel_setsockopt() and
>> > required a separate flag.  
>> 
>> On s390 TASK_SIZE is defined as -PAGE_SIZE, so with the patch above the
>> kernel would always try to fetch it from user space. I think it would be
>> the same for parisc.
>
> As a work around for these cases, would something like this work?

Hmm, i don't see how. On s390, TASK_SIZE is -PAGE_SIZE, which means
0xfffffffffffff000 so i think the if() condition below is always true.

Too bad that the __user attribute is stripped during a normal compile.
But couldn't we add the information whether a pointer belongs to user
or kernel space in the trace event definition? For syscall tracing it's
easy, because pointer types in SYSCALL_DEFINE() and friends are always
userspace pointers?

> -- Steve
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> index 91352a64be09..06013822764c 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> @@ -676,7 +676,15 @@ static __always_inline char *test_string(char *str)
>  	ubuf = this_cpu_ptr(ustring_per_cpu);
>  	kstr = ubuf->buffer;
>  
> -	if (likely((unsigned long)str >= TASK_SIZE)) {
> +	/*
> +	 * Test the address of ustring_per_cpu against TASK_SIZE, as
> +	 * comparing TASK_SIZE to determine kernel/user space address
> +	 * is not enough on some architectures. If the address is less
> +	 * than TASK_SIZE we know this is the case, in which we should
> +	 * always use the from_kernel variant.
> +	 */
> +	if ((unsigned long)&ustring_per_cpu < (unsigned long)TASK_SIZE ||
> +	    likely((unsigned long)str >= TASK_SIZE)) {
>  		/* For safety, do not trust the string pointer */
>  		if (!strncpy_from_kernel_nofault(kstr, str, USTRING_BUF_SIZE))
>  			return NULL;

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-13 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-10 16:55 Steven Rostedt
2022-01-10 17:11 ` David Laight
2022-01-10 17:24   ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-10 17:29     ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-10 21:58     ` David Laight
2022-01-11 20:55       ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-13 17:57         ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-13 21:28           ` Sven Schnelle [this message]
2022-01-13 21:51             ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-14  2:15               ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-14  7:29                 ` Sven Schnelle
2022-01-14  9:35                 ` David Laight
2022-01-13 22:11             ` David Laight
2022-01-13 22:28               ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-10 22:03     ` David Laight
2022-01-11  0:21       ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-12  4:13     ` Pingfan Liu
2022-01-13 18:04       ` Steven Rostedt
2022-01-13 22:02       ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yt9dwnj3wcke.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=zanussi@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome