From: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
To: <terry.bowman@amd.com>, <linux@roeck-us.net>,
<linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>, <jdelvare@suse.com>,
<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, <wsa@kernel.org>,
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>, <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
<rrichter@amd.com>, <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
<sudheesh.mavila@amd.com>, <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com>,
<Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>, <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>,
<Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] i2c: piix4: Move port I/O region request/release code into functions
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:11:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220118221152.300444-3-terry.bowman@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220118221152.300444-1-terry.bowman@amd.com>
Move duplicated region request and release code into a function. Move is
in preparation for following MMIO changes.
Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>
To: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
Cc: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Cc: Thomas Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c
index b88d990b013f..14324e03fe24 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c
@@ -165,6 +165,26 @@ struct i2c_piix4_adapdata {
u8 port; /* Port number, shifted */
};
+static int piix4_sb800_region_setup(struct device *dev)
+{
+ if (!request_muxed_region(SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX,
+ SB800_PIIX4_SMB_MAP_SIZE,
+ "sb800_piix4_smb")) {
+ dev_err(dev,
+ "SMB base address index region 0x%x already in use.\n",
+ SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void piix4_sb800_region_release(struct device *dev)
+{
+ release_region(SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX,
+ SB800_PIIX4_SMB_MAP_SIZE);
+}
+
static int piix4_setup(struct pci_dev *PIIX4_dev,
const struct pci_device_id *id)
{
@@ -270,6 +290,7 @@ static int piix4_setup_sb800(struct pci_dev *PIIX4_dev,
unsigned short piix4_smba;
u8 smba_en_lo, smba_en_hi, smb_en, smb_en_status, port_sel;
u8 i2ccfg, i2ccfg_offset = 0x10;
+ int retval;
/* SB800 and later SMBus does not support forcing address */
if (force || force_addr) {
@@ -291,21 +312,16 @@ static int piix4_setup_sb800(struct pci_dev *PIIX4_dev,
else
smb_en = (aux) ? 0x28 : 0x2c;
- if (!request_muxed_region(SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX,
- SB800_PIIX4_SMB_MAP_SIZE,
- "sb800_piix4_smb")) {
- dev_err(&PIIX4_dev->dev,
- "SMB base address index region 0x%x already in use.\n",
- SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX);
- return -EBUSY;
- }
+ retval = piix4_sb800_region_setup(&PIIX4_dev->dev);
+ if (retval)
+ return retval;
outb_p(smb_en, SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX);
smba_en_lo = inb_p(SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX + 1);
outb_p(smb_en + 1, SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX);
smba_en_hi = inb_p(SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX + 1);
- release_region(SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX, SB800_PIIX4_SMB_MAP_SIZE);
+ piix4_sb800_region_release(&PIIX4_dev->dev);
if (!smb_en) {
smb_en_status = smba_en_lo & 0x10;
@@ -686,10 +702,9 @@ static s32 piix4_access_sb800(struct i2c_adapter *adap, u16 addr,
u8 port;
int retval;
- if (!request_muxed_region(SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX,
- SB800_PIIX4_SMB_MAP_SIZE,
- "sb800_piix4_smb"))
- return -EBUSY;
+ retval = piix4_sb800_region_setup(&adap->dev);
+ if (retval)
+ return retval;
/* Request the SMBUS semaphore, avoid conflicts with the IMC */
smbslvcnt = inb_p(SMBSLVCNT);
@@ -764,7 +779,7 @@ static s32 piix4_access_sb800(struct i2c_adapter *adap, u16 addr,
piix4_imc_wakeup();
release:
- release_region(SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX, SB800_PIIX4_SMB_MAP_SIZE);
+ piix4_sb800_region_release(&adap->dev);
return retval;
}
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-18 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-18 22:11 [PATCH v2 0/8] i2c: piix4: Replace cd6h/cd7h port I/O accesses with MMIO accesses Terry Bowman
2022-01-18 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] i2c: piix4: Replace hardcoded memory map size with a #define Terry Bowman
2022-01-18 22:11 ` Terry Bowman [this message]
2022-01-18 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] i2c: piix4: Move SMBus controller base address detect into function Terry Bowman
2022-01-18 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] i2c: piix4: Move SMBus port selection " Terry Bowman
2022-01-18 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] i2c: piix4: Add EFCH MMIO support to region request and release Terry Bowman
2022-01-18 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] i2c: piix4: Add EFCH MMIO support to SMBus base address detect Terry Bowman
2022-01-18 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] i2c: piix4: Add EFCH MMIO support for SMBus port select Terry Bowman
2022-01-18 22:11 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] i2c: piix4: Enable EFCH MMIO for Family 17h+ Terry Bowman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220118221152.300444-3-terry.bowman@amd.com \
--to=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com \
--cc=Mario.Limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com \
--cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=sudheesh.mavila@amd.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome