From: Dylan Yudaken <dylany@fb.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
<io-uring@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Dylan Yudaken <dylany@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] io_uring: consistent behaviour with linked read/write
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 06:16:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220221141649.624233-1-dylany@fb.com> (raw)
Currently submitting multiple read/write for one file with offset = -1 will
not behave as if calling read(2)/write(2) multiple times. The offset may be
pinned to the same value for each submission (for example if they are
punted to the async worker) and so each read/write will have the same
offset.
This patch series fixes this.
Patch 1,3 cleans up the code a bit
Patch 2 grabs the file position at execution time, rather than when the job
is queued to be run which fixes inconsistincies when jobs are run asynchronously.
Patch 4 increments the file's f_pos when reading it, which fixes
inconsistincies with concurrent runs.
A test for this will be submitted to liburing separately.
v2:
* added patch 4 which fixes cases where IOSQE_IO_LINK is not set
Dylan Yudaken (4):
io_uring: remove duplicated calls to io_kiocb_ppos
io_uring: update kiocb->ki_pos at execution time
io_uring: do not recalculate ppos unnecessarily
io_uring: pre-increment f_pos on rw
fs/io_uring.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
base-commit: 754e0b0e35608ed5206d6a67a791563c631cec07
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2022-02-21 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-21 14:16 Dylan Yudaken [this message]
2022-02-21 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] io_uring: remove duplicated calls to io_kiocb_ppos Dylan Yudaken
2022-02-21 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] io_uring: update kiocb->ki_pos at execution time Dylan Yudaken
2022-02-21 16:32 ` Jens Axboe
2022-02-21 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] io_uring: do not recalculate ppos unnecessarily Dylan Yudaken
2022-02-21 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] io_uring: pre-increment f_pos on rw Dylan Yudaken
2022-02-21 18:00 ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-02-22 7:20 ` Hao Xu
2022-02-22 8:26 ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-02-22 7:34 ` Hao Xu
2022-02-22 10:52 ` Dylan Yudaken
2022-02-21 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] io_uring: consistent behaviour with linked read/write Jens Axboe
2022-02-21 17:48 ` Dylan Yudaken
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220221141649.624233-1-dylany@fb.com \
--to=dylany@fb.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®