* Re: [PATCH] kasan: update function name in comments [not found] ` <7a6afd53-a5c8-1be3-83cc-832596702401@huawei.com> @ 2022-02-21 11:15 ` Marco Elver 2022-02-23 22:30 ` Peter Collingbourne 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Marco Elver @ 2022-02-21 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Miaohe Lin Cc: Peter Collingbourne, Andrew Morton, linux-mm, Andrey Konovalov, kasan-dev, LKML On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 03:00, Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote: > > On 2022/2/19 9:24, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > > The function kasan_global_oob was renamed to kasan_global_oob_right, > > but the comments referring to it were not updated. Do so. > > > > Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I20faa90126937bbee77d9d44709556c3dd4b40be > > Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com> > > Fixes: e5f4728767d2 ("kasan: test: add globals left-out-of-bounds test") > > This Fixes tag is unneeded. > > Except the above nit, this patch looks good to me. Thanks. > > Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> And yes, the Fixes tag should be removed to not have stable teams do unnecessary work. +Cc'ing missing mailing lists (use get_maintainers.pl - in particular, LKML is missing, which should always be Cc'd for archival purposes so that things like b4 can work properly). > > --- > > lib/test_kasan.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c > > index 26a5c9007653..a8dfda9b9630 100644 > > --- a/lib/test_kasan.c > > +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c > > @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ static void ksize_uaf(struct kunit *test) > > static void kasan_stack_oob(struct kunit *test) > > { > > char stack_array[10]; > > - /* See comment in kasan_global_oob. */ > > + /* See comment in kasan_global_oob_right. */ > > char *volatile array = stack_array; > > char *p = &array[ARRAY_SIZE(stack_array) + OOB_TAG_OFF]; > > > > @@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ static void kasan_alloca_oob_left(struct kunit *test) > > { > > volatile int i = 10; > > char alloca_array[i]; > > - /* See comment in kasan_global_oob. */ > > + /* See comment in kasan_global_oob_right. */ > > char *volatile array = alloca_array; > > char *p = array - 1; > > > > @@ -808,7 +808,7 @@ static void kasan_alloca_oob_right(struct kunit *test) > > { > > volatile int i = 10; > > char alloca_array[i]; > > - /* See comment in kasan_global_oob. */ > > + /* See comment in kasan_global_oob_right. */ > > char *volatile array = alloca_array; > > char *p = array + i; > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kasan: update function name in comments 2022-02-21 11:15 ` [PATCH] kasan: update function name in comments Marco Elver @ 2022-02-23 22:30 ` Peter Collingbourne 2022-02-23 23:35 ` Marco Elver 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Peter Collingbourne @ 2022-02-23 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marco Elver Cc: Miaohe Lin, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List, Andrey Konovalov, kasan-dev, LKML On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 3:15 AM Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 03:00, Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote: > > > > On 2022/2/19 9:24, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > > > The function kasan_global_oob was renamed to kasan_global_oob_right, > > > but the comments referring to it were not updated. Do so. > > > > > > Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I20faa90126937bbee77d9d44709556c3dd4b40be > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com> > > > Fixes: e5f4728767d2 ("kasan: test: add globals left-out-of-bounds test") > > > > This Fixes tag is unneeded. > > > > Except the above nit, this patch looks good to me. Thanks. > > > > Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> > > Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> > > And yes, the Fixes tag should be removed to not have stable teams do > unnecessary work. I thought that Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org controlled whether the patch is to be taken to the stable kernel and Fixes: was more of an informational tag. At least that's what this seems to say: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#reviewer-s-statement-of-oversight > +Cc'ing missing mailing lists (use get_maintainers.pl - in particular, > LKML is missing, which should always be Cc'd for archival purposes so > that things like b4 can work properly). get_maintainers.pl tends to list a lot of reviewers so I try to filter it to only the most important recipients or only use it for "important" patches (like the uaccess logging patch). It's also a bit broken in my workflow -- https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210913233435.24585-1-pcc@google.com/ fixes one of the problems but there are others. Doesn't b4 scan all the mailing lists? So I'd have imagined it wouldn't matter which one you send it to. Peter ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kasan: update function name in comments 2022-02-23 22:30 ` Peter Collingbourne @ 2022-02-23 23:35 ` Marco Elver 2022-02-24 4:07 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Marco Elver @ 2022-02-23 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Collingbourne Cc: Miaohe Lin, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List, Andrey Konovalov, kasan-dev, LKML, Sasha Levin On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 at 23:31, Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com> wrote: [...] > > > > Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I20faa90126937bbee77d9d44709556c3dd4b40be > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com> > > > > Fixes: e5f4728767d2 ("kasan: test: add globals left-out-of-bounds test") > > > > > > This Fixes tag is unneeded. > > > > > > Except the above nit, this patch looks good to me. Thanks. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> > > > > Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> > > > > And yes, the Fixes tag should be removed to not have stable teams do > > unnecessary work. > > I thought that Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org controlled whether the patch > is to be taken to the stable kernel and Fixes: was more of an > informational tag. At least that's what this seems to say: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#reviewer-s-statement-of-oversight These days patches that just have a Fixes tag (and no Cc: stable) will be auto-picked in many (most?) cases (by empirical observation). I think there were also tree-specific variances of this policy, but am not sure anymore. What is the latest policy? > > +Cc'ing missing mailing lists (use get_maintainers.pl - in particular, > > LKML is missing, which should always be Cc'd for archival purposes so > > that things like b4 can work properly). > > get_maintainers.pl tends to list a lot of reviewers so I try to filter > it to only the most important recipients or only use it for > "important" patches (like the uaccess logging patch). It's also a bit > broken in my workflow -- > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210913233435.24585-1-pcc@google.com/ > fixes one of the problems but there are others. That's fair. It just seemed that something went wrong given kasan-dev@googlegroups.com wasn't Cc'd. FWIW, syzbot uses 'get_maintainer.pl --git-min-percent=20' which is a bit less aggressive with Cc'ing folks not mentioned explicitly in MAINTAINERS. > Doesn't b4 scan all the mailing lists? So I'd have imagined it > wouldn't matter which one you send it to. Those under lore.kernel.org or lists.linux.dev. Seems linux-mm does get redirected to lore: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ -- It's not entirely obvious which are lore managed and which aren't (obviously things like kasan-dev@googlegroups.com aren't). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kasan: update function name in comments 2022-02-23 23:35 ` Marco Elver @ 2022-02-24 4:07 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2022-02-24 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marco Elver Cc: Peter Collingbourne, Miaohe Lin, Linux Memory Management List, Andrey Konovalov, kasan-dev, LKML, Sasha Levin On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:35:32 +0100 Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote: > > I thought that Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org controlled whether the patch > > is to be taken to the stable kernel and Fixes: was more of an > > informational tag. At least that's what this seems to say: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#reviewer-s-statement-of-oversight > > These days patches that just have a Fixes tag (and no Cc: stable) will > be auto-picked in many (most?) cases (by empirical observation). > > I think there were also tree-specific variances of this policy, but am > not sure anymore. What is the latest policy? The -stable maintainers have been asked not to do that for MM patches - to only take those which the developers (usually I) have explicitly tagged for backporting. I don't know how rigorously this is being followed. Probably OK for patches to mm/* but if it's drivers/base/node.c then heaven knows. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-24 4:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20220219012433.890941-1-pcc@google.com>
[not found] ` <7a6afd53-a5c8-1be3-83cc-832596702401@huawei.com>
2022-02-21 11:15 ` [PATCH] kasan: update function name in comments Marco Elver
2022-02-23 22:30 ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-02-23 23:35 ` Marco Elver
2022-02-24 4:07 ` Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®