Re: [PATCH] sched: Make preempt_enable_no_resched() behave like preempt_enable() on PREEMPT_RT

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 07:30:32PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> 
> Use the distinction that has been made earlier between
> preempt_enable_no_resched() and sched_preempt_enable_no_resched().
> sched_preempt_enable_no_resched() is used within the scheduler where an
> immediate schedule() follows. preempt_enable_no_resched() is used
> outside of the scheduler and an immediate schedule() invocation may not
> follow for other reasons.
> 
> The lack of an immediate schedule() invocation matters on PREEMPT_RT
> where it will introduce latencies while the scheduler expects a context
> switch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/preempt.h | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h
> index b4381f255a5ca..582e43856a532 100644
> --- a/include/linux/preempt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
> @@ -210,7 +210,11 @@ do { \
>  	preempt_count_dec(); \
>  } while (0)
>  
> -#define preempt_enable_no_resched() sched_preempt_enable_no_resched()
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> +# define preempt_enable_no_resched() preempt_enable()
> +#else
> +# define preempt_enable_no_resched() sched_preempt_enable_no_resched()
> +#endif

Ignoring !x86 for a moment:

arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:    preempt_enable_no_resched();
arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:    preempt_enable_no_resched();
include/linux/preempt.h:#define sched_preempt_enable_no_resched() \
include/linux/preempt.h:#define preempt_enable_no_resched() sched_preempt_enable_no_resched()
include/linux/preempt.h:#define preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace() \
include/linux/preempt.h:#define sched_preempt_enable_no_resched()       barrier()
include/linux/preempt.h:#define preempt_enable_no_resched()             barrier()
include/linux/preempt.h:#define preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace()     barrier()
include/linux/preempt.h:#undef sched_preempt_enable_no_resched
include/linux/preempt.h:#undef preempt_enable_no_resched
include/linux/preempt.h:#undef preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace
kernel/sched/core.c:            preempt_enable_no_resched();
kernel/sched/core.c:                    preempt_enable_no_resched();
kernel/sched/core.c:            sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
kernel/sched/core.c:    sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
kernel/sched/core.c:            sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
kernel/sched/core.c:            preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace();
kernel/sched/core.c:            preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace();
kernel/sched/core.c:            sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
kernel/sched/core.c:    sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
kernel/signal.c:                preempt_enable_no_resched();
kernel/smpboot.c:                       preempt_enable_no_resched();
lib/smp_processor_id.c: preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace();


Surely we can audit that... At a glance the proposed patch does more
harm than good. Only the kmmio case looks obviousl fail, but then IIRC
kmmio had worse problems.