From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-audit@redhat.com,
keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com,
stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v33 25/29] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:46:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220310234632.16194-26-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220310234632.16194-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Replace the single skb pointer in an audit_buffer with
a list of skb pointers. Add the audit_stamp information
to the audit_buffer as there's no guarantee that there
will be an audit_context containing the stamp associated
with the event. At audit_log_end() time create auxiliary
records (none are currently defined) as have been added
to the list.
Suggested-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
kernel/audit.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
index f012c3786264..4713e66a12af 100644
--- a/kernel/audit.c
+++ b/kernel/audit.c
@@ -197,8 +197,10 @@ static struct audit_ctl_mutex {
* to place it on a transmit queue. Multiple audit_buffers can be in
* use simultaneously. */
struct audit_buffer {
- struct sk_buff *skb; /* formatted skb ready to send */
+ struct sk_buff *skb; /* the skb for audit_log functions */
+ struct sk_buff_head skb_list; /* formatted skbs, ready to send */
struct audit_context *ctx; /* NULL or associated context */
+ struct audit_stamp stamp; /* audit stamp for these records */
gfp_t gfp_mask;
};
@@ -1744,7 +1746,6 @@ static void audit_buffer_free(struct audit_buffer *ab)
if (!ab)
return;
- kfree_skb(ab->skb);
kmem_cache_free(audit_buffer_cache, ab);
}
@@ -1760,11 +1761,15 @@ static struct audit_buffer *audit_buffer_alloc(struct audit_context *ctx,
ab->skb = nlmsg_new(AUDIT_BUFSIZ, gfp_mask);
if (!ab->skb)
goto err;
- if (!nlmsg_put(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0))
+ if (!nlmsg_put(ab->skb, 0, 0, type, 0, 0)) {
+ kfree_skb(ab->skb);
goto err;
+ }
ab->ctx = ctx;
ab->gfp_mask = gfp_mask;
+ skb_queue_head_init(&ab->skb_list);
+ skb_queue_tail(&ab->skb_list, ab->skb);
return ab;
@@ -1825,7 +1830,6 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
int type)
{
struct audit_buffer *ab;
- struct audit_stamp stamp;
if (audit_initialized != AUDIT_INITIALIZED)
return NULL;
@@ -1880,14 +1884,14 @@ struct audit_buffer *audit_log_start(struct audit_context *ctx, gfp_t gfp_mask,
return NULL;
}
- audit_get_stamp(ab->ctx, &stamp);
+ audit_get_stamp(ab->ctx, &ab->stamp);
/* cancel dummy context to enable supporting records */
if (ctx)
ctx->dummy = 0;
audit_log_format(ab, "audit(%llu.%03lu:%u): ",
- (unsigned long long)stamp.ctime.tv_sec,
- stamp.ctime.tv_nsec/1000000,
- stamp.serial);
+ (unsigned long long)ab->stamp.ctime.tv_sec,
+ ab->stamp.ctime.tv_nsec/1000000,
+ ab->stamp.serial);
return ab;
}
@@ -2378,26 +2382,19 @@ int audit_signal_info(int sig, struct task_struct *t)
}
/**
- * audit_log_end - end one audit record
- * @ab: the audit_buffer
+ * __audit_log_end - end one audit record
+ * @skb: the buffer to send
*
* We can not do a netlink send inside an irq context because it blocks (last
* arg, flags, is not set to MSG_DONTWAIT), so the audit buffer is placed on a
* queue and a kthread is scheduled to remove them from the queue outside the
* irq context. May be called in any context.
*/
-void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
+static void __audit_log_end(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- struct sk_buff *skb;
struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
- if (!ab)
- return;
-
if (audit_rate_check()) {
- skb = ab->skb;
- ab->skb = NULL;
-
/* setup the netlink header, see the comments in
* kauditd_send_multicast_skb() for length quirks */
nlh = nlmsg_hdr(skb);
@@ -2408,6 +2405,26 @@ void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
wake_up_interruptible(&kauditd_wait);
} else
audit_log_lost("rate limit exceeded");
+}
+
+/**
+ * audit_log_end - end one audit record
+ * @ab: the audit_buffer
+ *
+ * We can not do a netlink send inside an irq context because it blocks (last
+ * arg, flags, is not set to MSG_DONTWAIT), so the audit buffer is placed on a
+ * queue and a kthread is scheduled to remove them from the queue outside the
+ * irq context. May be called in any context.
+ */
+void audit_log_end(struct audit_buffer *ab)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+ if (!ab)
+ return;
+
+ while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&ab->skb_list)))
+ __audit_log_end(skb);
audit_buffer_free(ab);
}
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-10 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220310234632.16194-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 00/29] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 01/29] integrity: disassociate ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule Casey Schaufler
2022-03-11 10:48 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 02/29] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 03/29] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 04/29] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 05/29] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 06/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 07/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 08/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 09/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 10/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 11/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_current_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 12/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 13/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-03-11 7:52 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-11 9:16 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-12 4:50 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 14/29] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 15/29] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 16/29] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 17/29] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 18/29] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 19/29] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 20/29] binder: Pass LSM identifier for confirmation Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 21/29] LSM: Extend security_secid_to_secctx to include module selection Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 22/29] Audit: Keep multiple LSM data in audit_names Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 23/29] Audit: Create audit_stamp structure Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 24/29] LSM: Add a function to report multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2022-03-15 23:47 ` [PATCH v33 25/29] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer Paul Moore
2022-03-16 0:06 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 26/29] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-03-15 23:47 ` Paul Moore
2022-03-16 0:17 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 27/29] Audit: Add record for multiple object " Casey Schaufler
2022-03-15 23:47 ` Paul Moore
2022-03-16 0:23 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-03-16 1:08 ` Paul Moore
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 28/29] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2022-03-10 23:46 ` [PATCH v33 29/29] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220310234632.16194-26-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®