From: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
To: tj@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v7 1/8] kernfs: Introduce interface to access global kernfs_open_file_mutex.
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 18:26:05 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220317072612.163143-2-imran.f.khan@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220317072612.163143-1-imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
This allows to change underlying mutex locking, without needing to change
the users of the lock. For example next patch modifies this interface to
use hashed mutexes in place of a single global kernfs_open_file_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
---
fs/kernfs/file.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/kernfs/file.c b/fs/kernfs/file.c
index 7aefaca876a0..99793c32abc3 100644
--- a/fs/kernfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/kernfs/file.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
* kernfs_open_node->files, which is protected by kernfs_open_file_mutex.
*/
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kernfs_open_node_lock);
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+DEFINE_MUTEX(kernfs_open_file_mutex);
struct kernfs_open_node {
atomic_t refcnt;
@@ -519,9 +519,10 @@ static int kernfs_get_open_node(struct kernfs_node *kn,
struct kernfs_open_file *of)
{
struct kernfs_open_node *on, *new_on = NULL;
+ struct mutex *mutex = NULL;
retry:
- mutex_lock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+ mutex = kernfs_open_file_mutex_lock(kn);
spin_lock_irq(&kernfs_open_node_lock);
if (!kn->attr.open && new_on) {
@@ -536,7 +537,7 @@ static int kernfs_get_open_node(struct kernfs_node *kn,
}
spin_unlock_irq(&kernfs_open_node_lock);
- mutex_unlock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(mutex);
if (on) {
kfree(new_on);
@@ -570,9 +571,10 @@ static void kernfs_put_open_node(struct kernfs_node *kn,
struct kernfs_open_file *of)
{
struct kernfs_open_node *on = kn->attr.open;
+ struct mutex *mutex = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
- mutex_lock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+ mutex = kernfs_open_file_mutex_lock(kn);
spin_lock_irqsave(&kernfs_open_node_lock, flags);
if (of)
@@ -584,7 +586,7 @@ static void kernfs_put_open_node(struct kernfs_node *kn,
on = NULL;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kernfs_open_node_lock, flags);
- mutex_unlock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(mutex);
kfree(on);
}
@@ -724,11 +726,11 @@ static void kernfs_release_file(struct kernfs_node *kn,
/*
* @of is guaranteed to have no other file operations in flight and
* we just want to synchronize release and drain paths.
- * @kernfs_open_file_mutex is enough. @of->mutex can't be used
+ * @open_file_mutex is enough. @of->mutex can't be used
* here because drain path may be called from places which can
* cause circular dependency.
*/
- lockdep_assert_held(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+ lockdep_assert_held(kernfs_open_file_mutex_ptr(kn));
if (!of->released) {
/*
@@ -745,11 +747,12 @@ static int kernfs_fop_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
struct kernfs_node *kn = inode->i_private;
struct kernfs_open_file *of = kernfs_of(filp);
+ struct mutex *lock = NULL;
if (kn->flags & KERNFS_HAS_RELEASE) {
- mutex_lock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+ lock = kernfs_open_file_mutex_lock(kn);
kernfs_release_file(kn, of);
- mutex_unlock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(lock);
}
kernfs_put_open_node(kn, of);
@@ -764,6 +767,7 @@ void kernfs_drain_open_files(struct kernfs_node *kn)
{
struct kernfs_open_node *on;
struct kernfs_open_file *of;
+ struct mutex *mutex = NULL;
if (!(kn->flags & (KERNFS_HAS_MMAP | KERNFS_HAS_RELEASE)))
return;
@@ -776,7 +780,7 @@ void kernfs_drain_open_files(struct kernfs_node *kn)
if (!on)
return;
- mutex_lock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+ mutex = kernfs_open_file_mutex_lock(kn);
list_for_each_entry(of, &on->files, list) {
struct inode *inode = file_inode(of->file);
@@ -788,7 +792,7 @@ void kernfs_drain_open_files(struct kernfs_node *kn)
kernfs_release_file(kn, of);
}
- mutex_unlock(&kernfs_open_file_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(mutex);
kernfs_put_open_node(kn, NULL);
}
diff --git a/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h b/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
index eeaa779b929c..df00a5f5a367 100644
--- a/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
+++ b/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
@@ -164,4 +164,22 @@ void kernfs_drain_open_files(struct kernfs_node *kn);
*/
extern const struct inode_operations kernfs_symlink_iops;
+extern struct mutex kernfs_open_file_mutex;
+
+static inline struct mutex *kernfs_open_file_mutex_ptr(struct kernfs_node *kn)
+{
+ return &kernfs_open_file_mutex;
+}
+
+static inline struct mutex *kernfs_open_file_mutex_lock(struct kernfs_node *kn)
+{
+ struct mutex *lock;
+
+ lock = kernfs_open_file_mutex_ptr(kn);
+
+ mutex_lock(lock);
+
+ return lock;
+}
+
#endif /* __KERNFS_INTERNAL_H */
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-17 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-17 7:26 [RESEND PATCH v7 0/8] " Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` Imran Khan [this message]
2022-03-17 21:34 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 1/8] " Al Viro
2022-04-05 5:36 ` Imran Khan
2022-04-05 14:24 ` Al Viro
2022-04-06 4:54 ` Imran Khan
2022-04-06 14:54 ` Al Viro
2022-04-06 15:18 ` Tejun Heo
2022-04-14 0:01 ` Imran Khan
2022-03-18 17:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-03-21 0:10 ` Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 2/8] kernfs: Replace global kernfs_open_file_mutex with hashed mutexes Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 3/8] kernfs: Introduce interface to access kernfs_open_node_lock Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 4/8] kernfs: Replace global kernfs_open_node_lock with hashed spinlocks Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 5/8] kernfs: Use a per-fs rwsem to protect per-fs list of kernfs_super_info Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 6/8] kernfs: Introduce interface to access per-fs rwsem Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 7/8] kernfs: Replace per-fs rwsem with hashed rwsems Imran Khan
2022-03-18 0:07 ` Al Viro
2022-03-21 1:57 ` Imran Khan
2022-03-21 7:29 ` Al Viro
2022-03-21 16:46 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-21 17:55 ` Al Viro
2022-03-21 19:20 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-22 2:40 ` Al Viro
2022-03-22 17:08 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-22 20:26 ` Al Viro
2022-03-22 21:20 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-28 0:15 ` Imran Khan
2022-03-28 17:30 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-30 2:23 ` Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 8/8] kernfs: Add a document to describe hashed locks used in kernfs Imran Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220317072612.163143-2-imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
--to=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®