From: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 7/8] kernfs: Replace per-fs rwsem with hashed rwsems.
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:15:30 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a692a5af-158e-ad0c-63a1-6525ee6d3898@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yjk3Nqft/U6vDvd1@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
Hello Al,
On 22/3/22 1:40 pm, Al Viro wrote:
[...]
>
> Sorry, misread that thing - the reason it copies the damn thing at all is
> the use of strsep(). Yecch... Rule of the thumb regarding strsep() use,
> be it in kernel or in the userland: don't. It's almost never the right
> primitive to use.
>
> Lookups should use qstr; it has both the length and place for hash.
> Switch kernfs_find_ns() to that (and lift the calculation of length
> into the callers that do not have it - note that kernfs_iop_lookup()
> does) and you don't need the strsep() shite (or copying) anymore.
>
Regarding using qstr in kernfs_find_ns, do you mean that I should remove
->name and ->hash with a ->qstr in kernfs_node and further modify
kernfs_name_compare to make use of qstr.name and qstr.hash.
Also the suggestion about removing buffer copying from kernfs_walk_ns is
not clear to me because kernfs_walk_ns invokes kernfs_find_ns with
individual path components so we need some mechanism to separate path
components.
Sorry if I have missed or misunderstood something in your suggestion.
Thanks,
-- Imran
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-28 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-17 7:26 [RESEND PATCH v7 0/8] kernfs: Introduce interface to access global kernfs_open_file_mutex Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 1/8] " Imran Khan
2022-03-17 21:34 ` Al Viro
2022-04-05 5:36 ` Imran Khan
2022-04-05 14:24 ` Al Viro
2022-04-06 4:54 ` Imran Khan
2022-04-06 14:54 ` Al Viro
2022-04-06 15:18 ` Tejun Heo
2022-04-14 0:01 ` Imran Khan
2022-03-18 17:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-03-21 0:10 ` Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 2/8] kernfs: Replace global kernfs_open_file_mutex with hashed mutexes Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 3/8] kernfs: Introduce interface to access kernfs_open_node_lock Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 4/8] kernfs: Replace global kernfs_open_node_lock with hashed spinlocks Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 5/8] kernfs: Use a per-fs rwsem to protect per-fs list of kernfs_super_info Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 6/8] kernfs: Introduce interface to access per-fs rwsem Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 7/8] kernfs: Replace per-fs rwsem with hashed rwsems Imran Khan
2022-03-18 0:07 ` Al Viro
2022-03-21 1:57 ` Imran Khan
2022-03-21 7:29 ` Al Viro
2022-03-21 16:46 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-21 17:55 ` Al Viro
2022-03-21 19:20 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-22 2:40 ` Al Viro
2022-03-22 17:08 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-22 20:26 ` Al Viro
2022-03-22 21:20 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-28 0:15 ` Imran Khan [this message]
2022-03-28 17:30 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-30 2:23 ` Imran Khan
2022-03-17 7:26 ` [RESEND PATCH v7 8/8] kernfs: Add a document to describe hashed locks used in kernfs Imran Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a692a5af-158e-ad0c-63a1-6525ee6d3898@oracle.com \
--to=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®